Who got soup at the Hexham Soup Kitchen? Part One

This guest blog has been written by Phil Carstairs.

NRO 604/14

The Hexham Soup Kitchen seems to have started life in the cholera epidemic of 1831/32 but finally became more permanently established in the late 1830s judging by reports in local newspapers, notably the Newcastle Courant.  Hexham Soup Kitchen’s minute books and other documents dating from 1841 to the early twentieth century are held in the Northumberland Archives at Woodhorn.  Contained in these documents are lists.  Lists of subscribers to the charity, lists of worthy committee members, lists of ingredients for making soup, of expenses for converting a vacant factory building into a soup kitchen, and lists of the deserving Hexham poor who were deemed worthy enough to receive soup and bread during the winter months.

This last category of list, recipients of soup, is the subject of this article.  Although there were many thousands of soup kitchens across nineteenth-century Britain, lists of those receiving soup at these soup kitchens have almost never survived.

Like many other soup kitchens, Hexham’s did not rely on subscribers to hand out tickets.  It invited the poor to apply for tickets which could be exchanged for soup and bread.  The Soup Kitchen’s committee interviewed applicants for tickets at the start of each ‘season’ (usually December to March) to determine their worthiness.  In 1851 the committee asked Mr Fairlamb, Hexham’s Relieving Officer, to attend the application process at the Vestry.  He was the poor law official appointed by the Guardians of the Poor for Hexham Poor Law Union. His job was to provide immediate relief to those poor in crisis and to refer cases for long-term relief or admission to the workhouse to the Board of Guardians.  He would have known many of Hexham’s poor and have had an opinion on who was deserving of charity and who was not. Mr Fairlamb was co-opted onto the committee in January 1861, cementing the close relationship between the charity and Hexham Poor Law Union.

The list of successful applicants would inform the committee how much soup to make and bread to order.  The eligible got only the amount of soup they deserved, and no more.  Further people could be added to the list during the season and ‘casuals’ (a category ranging from those suffering an emergency to tramps and vagrants) could be given soup on a case-by-case basis.

Soup lists for seven different seasons survive in the Northumberland Archives collections; each list contains the names of between 200 and 400 people.  The first five lists are written in the back of the minute book used between 1841 and 1881.  These five lists are on consecutive pages and so must have been recorded in chronological order.  Only the last is dated, 1880-1881.  The other two lists are in alphabetical ledgers.  The lists record the names of the heads of household and the family size or the soup ration awarded, and their approximate address (except for the second list).  The first list also records the occupation of many of the applicants.

Although six lists are not dated, we can work out to within a fairly narrow period when they were drawn up comparing the data recorded in the lists to census data and burial registers.  Street addresses can also provide data evidence for a list.  For instance, Jubilee Terrace probably got its name from Queen Victoria’s Golden Jubilee in June 1887 and first appears as an address in the first of the alphabetical ledgers (other preliminary data from the census suggests a date in the late 1880s or early 1890s for this list).  Identifying the exact dates of these lists is ongoing, but there appears to be one list from roughly each decade of the second half on the nineteenth century.  The rest of this article focusses on the 1880-1881 list, made in December 1880, coinciding roughly with the 1881 census which took place in early April.

The 1880 list contains the names of 339 heads of household, 23 names are crossed out and one a female first name was replaced with a male one.  People’s names will have been crossed out for various reasons.  Some died that winter, like Dorothy Dodd and Thomas Brown.  Others moved away, like Davison Bell, a joiner, whom the 1881 census records in Ryhope, Tyne and Wear.  His family were still in Hexham at census time but not on the soup list so, having found work in Ryhope, Davison may have been sending money home to his family.  Others were later deemed to be ineligible, perhaps because they found to be undeserving, or because they became so destitute that they had to enter the workhouse, like labourer William Askew and his two children.  Charles Lowe appears on the list twice, once crossed out, probably the correction of a bureaucratic error rather than him trying to cheat the system, which would probably have resulted in him losing all entitlement.

The 1880 list is not in alphabetical order, suggesting that it was drawn up in the order in which people applied.  In several instances people who were recorded in the census as being neighbours appear next to each other on the list.  This indicates that they probably attended the application meeting together and is evidence of community and solidarity.  Ann Dinwoodie and Isabella McGill were neighbours in Tyne Green and both worked at the paper mill as ‘paper dressers’; they attended the application meeting together, perhaps to provide each other with moral support: applicants for charity were exposed to intrusive investigation and to shame.  Similarly, Thomas Welch a painter and Ellen Ritson, a cordwainer (shoemaker) lived next door to one another in Bell’s Court on Priestpopple, and attended together.  All the soup applicants lived in Hexham town rather than the surrounding rural parts of the parish.  Although they had occupations listed in the census, they were mostly without work or only working part-time as queuing for soup and taking it home would have taken several hours.

Newcastle’s Bath House Estate, a journey through maps

One of the aims of the Northumberland Archives Charitable Trust is to improve and promote access
to documents held within Northumberland Archives. Projects have been funded to list collections as
well as adding descriptive content to existing collections. This additional information is added to our
catalogue making the content available and searchable via the Online Catalogue on the
Northumberland Archives website either at home or in the search rooms. The current cataloguing
project focuses on a collection of deeds relating to lands owned by members of the Clayton family in
the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

In 1884 Nathaniel George Clayton acquired the Bath House Estate in Newcastle-upon-Tyne which
included a mansion called Bath House, shops and dwelling houses at Westgate Road, dwelling
houses in Villa Place, and tithes from hereditaments formerly called Moats Gardens. The
conveyance refers to an earlier deed of 1873 in which the boundary of the lands was defined and
detailed on a map. In between the two transactions a number of mortgages raised funds secured
against the Estate. Like his uncle, John Clayton, before him, Nathaniel was also interested in
acquiring property and land with a close proximity to the Roman Wall.

Using the plan included on the 1873 deed it is possible to compare it to other plans to see changes
to central Newcastle-upon-Tyne. The main streets named on the plan are Bath Lane and Westgate
Hill.

ZCY/3/22

The 1844 ‘Plan of Newcastle and part of Gateshead’ by Thomas Oliver predates the conveyances mentioned; it highlights that part the boundary of the Bath House Estate matches the boundary between St. Johns Parish (in pink) and Westgate Township (in yellow). Again, Bath Lane and Westgate Hill are named.

NRO 00324/G/7

Google Earth shows the current view, the route between Bath Lane (highlighted with a blue dot) and Westgate Road (rather than Westgate Hill) is now intersected with St. James’ Boulevard; however, the ‘point’ where the two roads meet is still visible.  Adjacent to this is part of the Roman defensive wall built. 

Looking at the hand-drawn plans on various 19th century conveyances, it is amazing how often it is possible to match up an area of land to compare it to its modern usage. Why not have a look to see what other maps and plans you can find that show the changing use of this estate.

BERWICK ADVERTISER, 100 years ago

BERWICK ADVERTISER, 12 OCTOBER 1923

A WELL KNOWN BERWICKER IN CANADA

We publish this week a photo of Mr and Mrs William Hogg, who, as announced in our columns last week, have founded in Canada a “Berwick-on-Tweed Association.” Mr Hogg was at one time a well-known in sporting circles. He was associated with his father and brother in the bill-posting business in Berwick and district and was one of the most enthusiastic workers on behalf of the Berwick Cycling Club, in which he held office. He was also keenly interested in football. Mr Hogg’s wife is a daughter of Mr T. Rule, Fenwick, and a grand-daughter of the late Mr Peter Rule, Tweedmouth, Berwickers in Canada who wish to get in touch with each other should communicate with Mr Hogg at 13 Reynold’s Place, Toronto, Canada.

THE BABY SHOW

There was great excitement amongst the proud mothers of Berwick on Monday when in connection with the Baby Show, officials from the County Council Medical Department attended at the Parochial Hall to examine no less than 107 bonnie babies who had been entered for the competitions. The work of examination was started at 10 a.m. and when the babies arrived with their mothers in relays of ten every half hour, the work went through without a hitch, being about 4.30.

Parochial Hall, Chapel Street, late 1960’s.
Ref: BRO 2103-4-4-12a

The examination was a very thorough one, the youngsters being judged in cleanliness, weight, limbs, digestion, and general health. As at other baby shows a number of rising generation objected strongly to be undressed, weighed and handled, and loudly protested, while others appeared to enter into the spirit of health week and posed like little statues of Greek gods.

THE PRESENTATION OF PRIZES

Thursday was of course the field day for mothers and not only those who were showing, but others who would have been likely competitors had the show been held thirty years ago, were lined up outside the Hall nearly an hour before the opening. In the centre of the hall a space had been reserved for the mothers of competing children, and the remaining floor space of the hall was utilised to the last inch, the crowd which was nearly wholly women extending out into Chapel Street. Even the yard was utilised by those wishing to see the babies, and through the open windows women could be seen struggling to get a look inside. At the back of the hall the heat was almost unbearable, nut there was a cool current of air I the centre of the hall from the open windows.

Ald. Wilson presided, and he was accompanied on the platform by Mr D. S. Twigg, Town Clerk; Dr P. W. Macglan, Mrs Redpath, Mrs De La Hey, Mrs Macaskill, Mrs Erskine, Mrs Jno.Gray, Miss Weir and Miss Makin, of the County Council Medical Service; Miss Chisholm, Tweedmouth.

Mrs De La Hey then graciously presented the prizes, and as each proud mother went up to the platform carrying her baby, the assembly cheered loudly. Some very bright children were amongst the winners and several when held up for the inspection of the audience, grinned broadly and one had the courage to wave its hand.  Girl prize-winners were in the majority, but the boys rather came in to their own in the twin classes. Ald. Wilson had a special word for Mrs Jefferson, 23 Walkergate, who was awarded a prize and also a special award as the mother who had reared a healthy baby under greatest difficulty. With a large family, said Mr Wilson, Mrs Jefferson has had her hands full, and we are all the more pleased to see her a prize-winner.

At the conclusion of the prize distribution, the Town Clerk moved a vote of thanks to the Chairman (Ald. Wilson), and in the course of a few remarks he said the show a “scream” as he had been led to believe from the advertisement. He noticed that girls predominated as prize-winners, and this pointed, he rather thought, to Berwick becoming in future years an ideal place for eligible bachelors to stay. (Laughter and applause.)

The following were the prize awards:-

Under 6 Months – 1, Mary Gordon, Mill Strand, Tweedmouth, and Janet Patton, 70 Church Street; 2, Elizabeth Johnson, 31 Woolmarket, and Nancy Guyan, 35 East Street; 3, Mary Johnson, 164 Main Street, Spittal.

Under 1 Year – 1, Isolda Wakenshaw, 13 High Street; 2, Margaret Logan, High Letham, Jack Gregg, 14 Quay Walls, Iris Robson, 30 Woolmarket, and Barbara Moffatt, 16 High Street; 3, James Cook, 15 Walkergate, and Charles James Menzies, 50 Castlegate; 4, Catherine Mavin, 76 Church Street.

Under 2 Years – 1, Emily I. C. Smith, Scotsgate House; 2, Harold Yardley, 10 Married Quarters; 3, William Dow; 85 High Street; 4. Thomas Spelman, 8 Church Road, Tweedmouth.

Under 3 Years – 1 Betty Trotter, 70 Church Street; 2. Margaret Horsbrough, 11 Scotts Place; 3, Eileen Swanston, 39 East Street.

Twins – 1 Douglas and William Craik, West End, Tweedmouth; 2 Douglas and Irene Cockburn, Castlegate, Berwick; 3, Norman and Nora Faill, 9 Coxon’s Lane, Berwick; 4, Ronald and Jean Heeley, Church Road, Tweedmouth.

Extra Prizes for Babies under 6 Months – Jessie Patterson, 5 Low Greens, James William Plummer, Married Quarters, George Abbot, married Quarters; Harry Jefferson, 23 Walkergate; George Manual, 16 High Street, Elizabeth Flannagan, 39 Chapel Street, Charlotte Blyth, 37 Chapel Street, and Susan Octon, 52 Church Street.

The Mother who has had the greatest difficulties and who has overcome them – Mrs Jefferson, 23 Walkergate.

Walkergate, dated 1934. REF: BRO 794-70-4-10

THE EXAMINERS’S VIEWS

Miss Weir, one of the examiners, said this was one of the best shows she had ever taken part in as an examiner. She was highly delighted with the way it had been taken up and the organisation was splendid. Both Miss Makin and herself had been particularly struck with the sporting manner in which mothers had received the results of the examination, and to the appreciation hearing they gave to any remarks made by the examiners. Even though many mothers had not the satisfaction of seeing their child a prize-winner they were not stinting in their praise of the examiners awards. “We were greatly impressed by the co-operation amongst workers on the Ladies’ spirit shown on the part of everyone to do their best. The babies on the whole were a very fine lot of youngsters, and we were very pleased with the high standard of mothercraft shown. the clothing of the children was generally good.”

ECHO OF BERWICK BURGLARY

At York Quarter Sessions on Monday Charles Arthur Benson, alias Bourne (21), motor mechanic, was sentenced to 20 months’ imprisonment for sealing a motor car. Benson, it will be remembered, was arrested at York when attempting to steal a motor car. He had previously broken into Springbank, Castle Terrace, and other places on his way south. He travelled on an old Indian motorcycle, and Alnwick and Gosforth both had his attention.

Indian Motorcycle, dated 1917.

It was stated that he was a native of Edinburgh. He received a good education and was apprenticed to a firm of motor engineers there. In 1916 he was sent to an industrial school for stealing a motor car, but absconded and committed a series of housebreaking offences in Edinburgh, for which he was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment. In 1917 he was sentenced to two terms of three months each at Berwick-on-Tweed for shop breaking at Mr Crisp’s premises, when he was singled out as the ringleader amongst some band boys of the K.O.S.B., and on completing his sentenced he returned to Edinburgh to his parents. In 1918, he committed a further series of housebreaking offences and was committed to a Borstal institution for three years, being released in 1920.

His parents sent him to a relative in Canada, but he stole a motor car there and was ordered a year’s imprisonment and deportation. On arrival home he was arrested and completed the Borstal term. Since September of last year he had resided with his parents a warrant out for him on further housebreaking charges.