Recently we had some very interesting training about one of our collections, namely the Quarter Sessions collection. Quarter sessions were courts that dealt with criminal and civil cases and were so called because they met four times a year, Epiphany (January), Easter (March or April), Midsummer (June) and Michaelmas (September).
A bit like our current justice system there were different courts that dealt with different types of crime. We have records in our archives relating to both the petty sessions (the most minor of crimes) and the quarter sessions (dealing with more serious criminal cases alongside civil matters including the licensing of pubs, registration of printing presses, hair powder taxes and many other matters.) Assize records are held at the National Archives in London.
Being inspired by what I had learned I had a look at our catalogue to see what records we hold, here at Northumberland Archives. A quick search brought me to Q/S/B/89/P26 which is entitled “Transportation Orders 1768-1808” it gives us a fascinating insight into early 19th century crime and punishment in Northumberland.
It is within our transportation records that we meet a certain John Mould, in a bundle of papers including his order for transportation along with a covering letter to Lord Percy (i.e. Hugh Percy the third Duke of Northumberland). The letter is dated 12th July 1807 from John Davidson, Clerk of the Peace of Northumberland and he writes enclosing the orders for transportation, sent to him by the goaler of Morpeth, asking for the Secretary of State’s orders for removal south and then abroad.
The transportation order tells us that John was “capitally convicted of the crime of High Treason in Counterfeiting the Coin of the Realm for which crime he received judgement of Death”. Fortunately for John he was reprieved by Sir George Wood, the judge in his case, and he was sentenced to transportation instead. Whilst, no doubt, this would have been entirely preferable to death, transportation was still a terrible sentence. If you were sentenced to a fixed number of years, then you would have the chance to return to your home. Only if, however, you could raise sufficient funds to pay for your passage.
John was not so lucky as he was sentenced for “the term of his natural life”. Presumably he knew little about the place he was being sent, although he may have heard about the dangerous and long journey to get there. He would have known that he would be travelling with strangers, desperate people, convicted of severe crimes.
At the time the UK transported its people mainly to Australia and Tasmania. The order relating to John says that he is to be transported to the coast of New South Wales or one of the islands adjacent. At the bottom of the page, it is written that John is in the thirty second year of his life and is a house-carpenter. It also says that he is “Of bad character and connected with a set of notorious people who infest Newcastle Upon Tyne and its environs.”…Charming!
A postscript to the letter to Lord Percy reads “I believe the order is to be removed to the hulks on the river Thames”. For anyone familiar with the novel “Great Expectations” by Charles Dickens the thought of being transported to the hulks sends a shiver down your spine. The Ancestry website holds the UK Prison Hulks Register and letter books 1802-1849 where we find John again, it gives the date of his arrival; 26th February 1808 onboard the Ship the “Retribution” (the very same one Dickens uses in his book and reputedly the one with the most fearsome reputation), it also gives us the date of his transportation, 27th May 1808.
Three months does not sound too long to wait but no doubt he would have been eager to leave, as the hulks had a lawless and vicious repute and not necessarily because of the prisoners. As illustrated in the press reports of the day, where it gives account of one of the prisoner’s awaiting transportation for life to Botany Bay. The newspaper says that “On his arrival aboard the Retribution…he was in the usual way ordered to strip…he swore he would not” it goes on to say, rather sinisterly, “The regular remedy according to the discipline of the hulks was applied, and his wrath was subdued.”
Not unsurprisingly this led some prisoners to desperate measures…
One incident that happened aboard the Retribution was between two convicts in 1809. It ended in murder; the weapon was a shoemaker’s knife…a lengthy report of this incident can be read in our search room using the British Newspaper Archive and specifically the report in the Saunders’s Newsletter and Daily Advertiser dated August the 30th 1809.
John was convicted alongside another Northumbrian, namely James Lowrey. James was sentenced to 7 years transportation, for committing burglary. His story was rather shorter however, as he died aboard the Retribution on the 20th of June 1813, four years into his seven-year sentence. Why he was not transported we do not know. James’ order tells us that he was 57 years old when convicted and was by trade a shoemaker. Perhaps it was his knife that featured in the murder referred to above!?
The court recorded that James was an “old and most notorious offender, and has for several years travelled the country leading a vagabond life.”
John Mould was transported aboard the Admiral Gambier under the command of Edward Harrison, she sailed from Portsmouth, on 2 July 1808, and arrived at Port Jackson (what we would now call Sydney) on 20th of December. She had carried 200 male convicts, of whom three died on the voyage.
If this blog has inspired you to learn more about our collections you may want to look at our website and in particular the LEARN page which features more information on Crime and Punishment including some striking “Wanted” posters. https://northumberlandarchives.com/test/learn/learn-topic-crime-and-punishment/