Northumberland Archives

BERWICK ADVERTISER, 24TH NOVEMBER 1922

by

BERWICK DIVISION ELECTION

DECLARATION OF THE POLL AT ALNWICK

Scenes of Great Enthusiasm In The Constituency

Bonfires, band, and cheering crowds welcome

Mr. Philipson as member For The Division

Alnwick was all agog on Thursday last, when the counting of the votes took place in the Town Hall. Counting started after eleven, and by mid-day a huge crowd gathered in the Market Place. The declaration was expected to be between half-past one and two o’clock, but it was announced shortly before two that the declaration would at least be another hour. Rumours were current that a re-count was taking place, but this was not a fact. About five minutes past four Mr H. Graham Lester, deputy acting Returning Officer, announced the result from the Town Hall steps as follows:-

HILTON PHILIPSON……………….11,933

Walter Runciman……………………7,354

And added. “I declare Mr Hilton Philipson to be the candidate elected for this Division.” (Loud cheers).

Appearing on the Town Hall steps, the new member said he must first of all propose a very hearty vote of thanks to the Returning Officer for the very efficient way in which he and his staff had carried out their duties. He was rather nervous, and he could not very well thank them properly, but he could only say that he was overjoyed by the way in which the people of this constituency had shown that they still wanted all moderate people to work together. (Cheers). He was quite sure that they would agree with him that the fight had been a good fight, a straight fight, and a clean fight. He thanked them very very much from the bottom of his heart, and he hoped that he would justify the confidence they had placed in him. (Cheers).

MR RUNCIMAN CONGRATULATES NEW MEMBER

Mr Runciman then spoke, saying – I wish to second the vote of thanks to the Returning Officer for the courtesy and kindness with which he has conducted today’s proceedings; and in doing so I wish to be the first to publicly congratulate Mr Philipson on becoming the member for this constituency. (Cheers). He has every reason to be proud of a constituency with such a history as this. (Hear, hear). I am glad to think that, although you have not chosen me as your member, you have at least chosen a Northumbrian. (Hear, hear, and cheers). Before passing within the hall Mr Runciman shook hands with the new member.

Mrs Philipson, who responded to calls for a speech thanked the electors in similar terms to what she used later at Berwick.

Berwick Town Hall early 1900’s (c) BRO 426-294

Mr Philipson was then carried shoulder high through the crowd to his motor car. Mr and Mrs Philipson, accompanied by cheering and excited crowd, proceeded slowly in their motor car up the step cobbled slope of Bondgate Hill to the committee room near the Corn Exchange, and Mr Runciman went to his committee rooms in the old “Officers” mess” near Bondgate Tower, where both addressed and thanked their workers.

Mr Philipson, speaking from an upper window, thanked the ladies first and then the Service men. “The way in which my comrades have stood by me has absolutely astounded me,” he said. “I thank everyone for all you have done, and let me say I will never let you down.” (A voice: “Good old lad.”)

Tumultuous cheering and the singing of “He’s a jolly god fellow” followed.

Huge crowds waited at the Town Hall, Berwick, for the election result, and at 4.20 this was announced by the Mayor. The result was greeted with loud cheers. Hand-bills giving the figures were printed at the “Advertiser” and circulated in the town.

THE RECEPTION OF THE NEWS

The constituency generally was staggered at the size of the majority. Those who remembered the last general election did not expect the result before 4 o’clock, and when ballot boxes have to be collected from like Holy Island it is not surprising that Berwick is not among the first results to be declared. That was the real reason for the delay, but when it was announced that a recount was necessary no one was surprised. The rumour ran that Philipson was in by 5, 9, 10, and 15 and other small majorities, which squared with the expectations of the man in the street. Mr Philipson’s own people knew how well he had polled: most of those not in the know expected Runciman to get in by a very small majority, but a recount with Philipson leading seemed not outside the bounds of possibility. The actual figures, as we say, were staggering. There is no getting away from it that the result is a great blow not only to Mr Runicman, but to Viscount Grey. With Sir Donald Maclean defeated, and Mr Asquith over 70, Mr Runciman, if returned, would frequently have acted as leader of the Wee Frees in the House of Commons, so that it is a double loss to him. It is no disparagement to Mr Philipson to say that there would have been advantages to Berwick and the constituency to be represented by one who had been a Cabinet Minister, and was still young, as politicians go. The constituency, however, decided to give a younger and untried man a chance, and there can be no doubt that the votes of the ex-Service men and the ladies brought this about. Mr Runciman is a powerful speaker, a good businessman and courageous. Over confidence was probably his undoing. When he first spoke in Berwick he had a very poor meeting, and he said openly that if Berwick didn’t want him other constituencies would be glad of him. When you are wooing it doesn’t do to take too much for granted. There has been a good deal of bitterness on both sides, and there is no denying that in many quarters Mr Runciman had to face for reasons good or bad considerable personal unpopularity. When that is so, scandal and malice get in a double blow, and spiteful rumours with no foundation undoubtedly did him a great deal of harm. Both candidates being Liberals did not induce their supporters to carry on the contest any more pleasantly, and even in 1906 there was less ill-feeling. In connection with the ex-Service vote, it will be remembered that, without setting foot in the constituency, Capt. Watson-Armstrong in 1918 polled 4397 votes again Sir Francis Blake’s 6721. Mr Philipson has taken his success with great modesty and has now to win his spurs by service in the House.

ENTHUSIAMS AT HIGH PITCH IN BERWICK

MR PHILIPSON’S CAR DRAGGED THROUGH CHEERING CROWDS BY EX-SERVICE MEN

Scenes of unparalleled enthusiasm were witnessed in Berwick on Thursday night, when Mr Philipson arrived to thank the electors. A huge crowd gathered in Hide Hill and Sandgate shortly before six o’clock and numbers of supporters and ex-Service men, who had proceeded to the Bridge End, held up Mr Philipson’s car and, fixing ropes to it they towed it though cheering crowds to Sandgate.

BRO 0426-355 Hide Hill, showing the King’s Arms Hotel, Berwick-upon-Tweed

The member and Mrs Philipson, standing up in the body of the car, acknowledged the cheers and shook the hands of hundreds of enthusiasts who clambered on the footboards. Never in the history of the constituency, since young Edward Grey was dragged in his carriage round the town after defeating Earl Percy, has such a scene been witnessed.

Mr and Mrs Philipson and their friends had difficulty in making their way through the crowd to their committee room. Cheer upon cheer went up, and the young member, towering above the seething crows, could be seen forcing his way to the passage and shaking hands with supporters.

The sash window of the committee room having been removed, the member addressed the crowd from there.

Mr Philipson (who had to stand some time before cheers died down) said- I cannot thank you enough for what you have done for me in helping to win this election. (Loud cheers). You have shown me hat, after all, “old soldiers never die.” (Laughter and cheers.) I must thank all of you for what you have done. It is you who have got me into Parliament. (Cheers)…………………………………………whole speech can be read in the Berwick Advertiser

Mrs Philipson (in response to an insistent demand from the crowd) made a neat little speech, which was distinctly heard by all. I thank you from the bottom of my heart, she said. (Cheers). It is a proud moment for me today; for first of all I am proud to think the object his father wished for him- (Loud cheers which drowned part of the sentence)- that he should strive to have the family name of Philipson honoured in the North had come to pass today. (Loud cheers). Secondly, I particularly wish to thank you men and women- (cheers)- who have voted for him for having given him his chance- his first chance in the beginning of his political career- to work in your interests and in the interest of the country. (Loud Cheers) I thank you all, and I promise to help him all I can. (Cheers). Mrs Philipson, kissing her hand to the huge assembly, stepped back from the window amid deafening cheers.

Mr and Mrs Philipson were again dragged in their Austin through the town, and after traversing the north part a return was made to the King’s Arms headed by a piper (Mr James Chisholm). A further speech was made in the King’s Arms, this can be read fully in the Advertiser.

AT THE CONCERT

Thanks to Mr Hilton Philipson’s kind consideration, the concert arranged by Mr W. S. Moor for the evening was a success. In the excitement of the election seats had not booked up too well, and the concert party on arriving in the midst of Berwick rejoicings concluded the affair would be a wash-out. However, Mr Philipson announced in his speech from the King’s Arms Hotel that he and Mrs Philipson would come along to the concert about 9 p.m. This turned the attention of the crowd to the concert, with the result that there were few vacant seats in the Corn Exchange.

Corn Exchange Berwick

Mr Philipson, introduced by Mr W. S. Moor as “our new M.P.,” had a great welcome, the concert party lining up on stage and leading the audience in singing “For he’s a jolly good fellow.” When the cheering quietened down, Mr Philipson again thanked the electors for the honour they had done him that day in putting him in the very proud position of member for the Division. “I cannot,” said Mr Philipson, “possibly hope to compare myself with Lord Grey – (cries of “Question”)- but I will do the utmost I possibly can – (applause)- and try to justify the confidence you have so lavishly given me today.” (Applause). Continuing, Mr Philipson said – I am told that never in the history of this town has there been such a demonstration as tonight. If you want to give three cheers for the people who made this possible, you ought to give them to yourselves and not me. (Applause).

Led by Mr Pike, the audience gave three lusty cheers for Mr Philipson, who afterwards left the Corn Exchange.

Stannington Land Settlement Association

by

Whilst researching for my previous blog on Parish records, I came across a record of a couple getting married in St Mary’s Church Morpeth on the 13th of November 1943. They were Arthur James Turner aged 24, a soldier and a bachelor and Elizabeth Ann Hill also 24 and a spinster, so far not that remarkable. It gets interesting however when you note her address, which is given as St George’s Hospital, Morpeth.

St George’s Hospital was then the County Asylum, so was Elizabeth a patient there? Well after much searching through our patient records for the asylum no record of her could be found. We also searched their staff lists, but again found no record of her. We do not know of any other people living at the asylum who were married, whilst there either as a patient or as a member of staff, perhaps you know otherwise? If so, please let us know.

On their marriage record their fathers’ names and occupations and the names of the witness were also recorded. Elizabeth’s father was a Thomas Hill, a boilerman and one of the witnesses was a Daisy Hill. So, with this information I was able to do some more digging.

Using the 1939 Register, which is free to access via our computers, using the Ancestry website, I found Elizabeth, living at home with her father Thomas, Ethel (presumably her mother), Daisy (presumably her sister) and Cecil (presumably her brother).

As for the address, well this time it was Stannington Land Settlement number 29. I had no idea what this meant, so with a bit of ‘googling’ I discovered that the Land Settlement Association (LSA) was a scheme set up in 1934 by the then government to help unemployed workers, giving them a small holding, approximately 5 acres, to produce goods as part of a cooperative.

Turning to our own records [NRO 5702/1 Land Settlement Association file of correspondence], I was able to find some very interesting material relating to Northumberland’s only LSA site, Moor Farm at Stannington, near Morpeth. We are lucky enough to have information relating to the sale of the estate at the County Hotel in Newcastle on the 7th of January 1969. The sale catalogue lists the estate as comprising of

“The manager’s house with homestead and field. Eleven well-built semi-detached dwelling houses and 126.07 acres of highly productive arable land and 2.41 acres of scrub land.”

Lot number six of the catalogue relates to Elizabeth’s home (number 29 holding) and says the property consisted of a semi-detached brick-built house containing front entrance, living room, kitchen, larder, back porch, wc, coal house, 3 bedrooms and bathroom, an outbuilding suitable for conversion to a garage and a garden. Number 29 sold for £2,400.

NRO 5702/1

Also included in our records are promotional pamphlets produced by the LSA giving information such as;

“All holdings are designed to provide a full-time occupation with pigs, poultry and horticulture, including glass (heated and cold) In no case are they suitable for dairy farming. The average rent is in the region of £75-£100. On each estate there is a central packing station where the tenants produce is graded, packed and sent to market. Capital of approx. £2,000 required to start and the Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food will loan up to three quarters of the cost on easy repayment terms for 15 yrs. Applicants must have some money to live on until the holding comes into production”

On each estate there was an estate manager and staff for small holders to consult with, although the requirement for previous horticultural or agricultural experience of min 5 years was stipulated.

According to Wikipedia between 1934 and 1939, 1,100 small holdings were established within 20 settlements. The allocation of settlements to the unemployed was suspended at the outbreak of the Second World War in order to increase food production. After the war the Association was incorporated within a County Council scheme for statutory provision of smallholdings designed as a first step for those going into agricultural production. In 1983 the scheme was wound-up, and all the properties were privatised, by which time it was producing roughly 40% of English home-grown salad crops. Quite an achievement!

There were other Land Settlement Association small-holding settlements around the country, situated at:

• Abington, Cambridgeshire

• Andover, Hampshire

• Broadwath, Cumbria

• Chawston, Bedfordshire

• Crofton, Cumbria

• Dalston, Cumbria

• Duxbury, Lancashire

• Elmesthorpe, Leicestershire

• Fen Drayton, Cambridgeshire

• Foxash, Essex

• Fulney, Lincolnshire

• Harrowby, Lincolnshire

• Newbourne, Suffolk

• Newent, Gloucestershire

• Oxcroft, Derbyshire

• Potton, Bedfordshire

• Sidlesham, Sussex

• Snaith, Yorkshire

• Yeldham, Essex

N.B. You may have noticed something strange about the photo of the 1939 register above. Our friend Elizabeth is initially recorded with the surname Hill, which was her name at the time, but this is crossed out and her married name of Turner is written above. We know that Elizabeth did not get married for another four years after the register, so how does her married name appear on the register?

The National Archives website explain that,

“The register was continually updated while National Registration was in force, when it was a legal requirement to notify the registration authorities of any change of name or address. This ended in 1952, but since 1948 the Register had also been used by the National Health Service, who continued updating the records until 1991, when paper-based record keeping was discontinued.

Changes of name for any reason were recorded; in practice this was mostly when women changed their surnames on marriage or re-marriage, but also includes changes of name for any other reason, such as by deed poll.

The majority of these name changes appear in the indexes so you can search for a person using either their name in 1939 or any subsequent name.

Worth knowing, happy searching!

BERWICK ADVERTISER, 10TH NOVEMBER 1922

by

BERWICK BOARD OF GUARDIANS

The monthly meeting of the Berwick Board of Guardians was held in the Board Room of the Workhouse on Monday afternoon. Miss C. H. Greet presided, others present being Miss J. E. B. Miller, Messrs J. H. Armstrong, bell, T. Bolus, T. Aird, E. Waugh, J. R. Wood, R. Rea, P. G. Peacocke, J. R. Mountjoy, and T. A. Summerfield. Mr H R. Peters, Clerk, Messers Short and Kennedy, Relieving Officers, and Mr A. H. Banks, Workhouse master, were also present.

The receipt of fruit and vegetables was intimated from Miss Greet and Mrs Sitwell, and from St. Mary’s Church, books and periodicals from the King’s Arms Hotel, Mrs Purves, and Mrs Aitken, fruit from Scremerston Parish Church, and magazines from Mrs R. R. Riddell. The thanks of the Board were directed to be conveyed to these donors.

DECREASE IN NUMBER OF INMATES AND TRAMPS

The inmates for the four weeks ending 21st October were as follows:- In the sick ward 12 men, 9 women, 1 child, and 2 infants, and in other parts of the House 11 men, 4 women, a total of 23 men as against 24 for the corresponding month last year, 13 women as against 19, 1 child as against 1, and 2 infants as against 1, a total of inmates of all classes of 39 as against 45 last year, a decrease of 6. The casuals numbered 13 as against 19 last year, also a decrease of 6.

Mr Wood commented on the decrease in the number of inmates. In view of the extra ordinary amount of unemployment and depression all round, the decrease was extra ordinary. The number of tramps was also reduced.

FIREWOOD TO BE CHEAPER

On recommendation of the Workhouse Committee, it was agreed to reduce the price of firewood sold at the Workhouse from 4s 6d per cwt. to 4s as from 1st November. Mr Bolus, in moving the adoption of this, stated that they had made a reasonable profit by the sale of firewood in the last 12 months, but the Master reported the sales were going down on account of competition. They thought it wise to reduce the price, which would also give them a good reasonable profit if the sales continued.

BA-U10-2 SHEET , 1852 cropped. Pictured above the layout of the Berwick Workhouse,
Board Room (centre of image).

WATER FOR BULL CLOSE HOUSES

The Committee also reported on having been obliged to connect a water supply to the Board’s property in Bull Close at a cost of £14. Mr Bolus explained that there had not been water laid on to the property, the tenants getting their water from a pipe in a yard near St. Mary’s Church. There had been a leakage which had flooded the stokehole of the heating apparatus at St. Mary’s Church and when this insisted on them putting in their own water supply. They had got an estimate from Mr Lamb, plumber, to connect the water outside on the roadway with the property and this had been completed. The Committee took expert advice on the question before accepting the estimates.

Mr J. R. Wood supported the action of the Committee. He was surprised to hear that water had not been connected up with property when it was purchased. If it had been done at the time the cost would have come as a capital charge on the premises and they would have heard no more about it. They must just pay the money and look pleasant.

BOILER UNSATISFACTORY

A report as to the condition of the boiler at the Workhouse was submitted from the Insurance Inspector, who drew attention to a bulge on the side of the boiler and also pointed out that they were only insured up to a pressure of 10lbs. with a blowout at 25lbs. and had been working the boiler up to 25lbs. He suggested that the repairs should be carried out within 12 months and that the safety valves should be readjusted.

Mr Bolus pointed out that a certain amount of responsibility rested with the board in view of the Inspector’s report as to the boiler. They had only a premium up to 10 lbs. and had been working the boiler from 15 to 25 lbs. This was important as the disinfector would not work under a pressure of 15 lbs., and in addition the heating apparatus and the laundry had to be worked, which would require not less than a 20 lbs. pressure, and if they were only allowed a pressure of 9 or 10 lbs., the boiler was no use for the work it was wanted to do in the Workhouse. He moved that the matter go to the Workhouse Committee for them to deal with it. He wondered as to why a boiler had been put in that did not to the work required to carry on the work of the Institution.

The Workhouse master thought the Inspector’s report was misleading, as it inferred that the boiler had been worked regularly to 25 lbs. that was not so. It was worked to anything between 10 and 25 lbs. and only occasionally up to 25. He thought it was peculiar that they were only allowed a pressure up to 10 lbs. but a blow out up to 25 lbs. The disinfector was not efficient till a 15 lbs. pressure. They might be able to carry on as at present but in a very unsatisfactory way. On account of the low pressure of the boiler the disinfector was not sufficient to kill vermin, and he had to rig up a cupboard in the tramps’ ward to fumigate the tramps’ clothing when necessary.

After further discussion the motion was agreed to the Committee being empowered to get expert advice on the matter, but to report to the Board before going further.

TWEED ROW, HORNCLIFFE

Dr McWhir reported as follows: Three cases of scarlet fever have been notified- one at Horncliffe, a second at South Ord, and a third at Shoreswood. Removal to hospital of the patients at Horncliffe and Shoreswood was deemed advisable. A case of scarlet fever in one of the cottages at Tweed Row, Horncliffe, had a fatal termination. The house, which has only one apartment with a capacity of 1798 cubic feet, accommodated five inmates- the father, the mother, and three young children. The floor is badly broken and the window is a fixture. The walls, roof and chimney of the dwelling all call for repairs, and the soil which is heaped up behind it ought to be removed.

The state of housing in the area in the early part of the 20th century is exemplified in this picture of Golden Square, Berwick, similar problems being experienced in the Norham and Islandshire District.

There is no privy for the household. Opportunity was taken to visit other cottages in the same row. One, also consisting of a single apartment with capacity of 1848 cubic feet, is tenanted by a family of five- the father, two daughters both over 20, a son aged 25, and a child of 4 years. The window of the apartment is a fixture, and there is no privy accommodation. The masonry is in much need of repair, and soil ought to be removed from the back. A third single-apartment house furnishes a home for five inmates- a mother, two girls aged 14 and 9 respectively, and two boys of 12 and 10 respectively. Here, again, there is no privy accommodation. A fourth house boasts two apartments with capacities of 1550 and 1300 cubic feet respectively, and shelters three inmates. The kitchen floor, framed of broken paving flags and concrete, is in need of repair. Both apartments are insufficiently lit. A down-spout is unprovided with a trap; there is no sink, and the chimney has a twist, which, to the mind of our Surveyor, rivals that of the leaning tower of Pisa. The wood of the back door, which is only 5ft. in height, is defective.

+ More