Murder At Bigges Main: Part Four

Welcome to the fourth and final blog in our series on the unsolved murder of John Thomas Bianchi and the assault on his cousin Elizabeth Philipson in January of 1919. Last time we examined the route the pair were taking on the night of the shooting and the route the murderer took on fleeing the scene. We also looked at some of the witness statements and the £50 reward poster.

This time let’s get to know the Bianchi family a little better. John Thomas Bianchi was the fourth child of Margaret Jane Bianchi, nee Phillipson, and John Thomas Bianchi (Snr). John (Snr) and Margaret would go on to have another three children including a Joseph George.

Joseph George is briefly mentioned in a more contemporary review of the murder case by a newspaper, the Sunday Sun in May 1962. They claim that a younger brother of John’s became a detective-sergeant at Scotland yard. They say that…

“On one occasion he fulfilled a vow by returning to Tyneside and going over the case stage by stage examining every little detail. But he had no better luck than his predecessors.”

Indeed the 1939 register for England and Wales has a Joseph G Bianchi living in West Ham with his occupation listed as “Police Officer Metropolitan Police”. The date of birth given matches other census information for John’s brother. So perhaps we can assume that this is the brother the newspaper was referring to. Despite his brother’s efforts the killer remained at large.

The police file has within it investigations into Elizabeth’s background, who she was friends with and what people thought of her. But as we know this line of enquiry did not produce any firm leads. But curiously they do not appear to have investigated John’s background, who his friends were and whether anyone could have meant him any harm.

We know, from the report of the funeral in the Illustrated Chronicle, that John worked at Hawthorn Leslie’s shipyard at Hebburn. However, none of his colleagues appear to have been interviewed to find out if he had had any problems at work. Or if any of his colleagues wished him ill. Hawthorn Leslie’s yard was just along the river from Palmer’s Jarrow shipyard where the E40 submarine, to which the gun had eventually been traced, was built. Could a worker from the shipyard have been involved?

Ref NRO 00541/131/1

Photograph showing the drilling of the horizontal joint in a turbine casting at the St. Peter’s Works of R and W. Hawthorn Leslie and Company Limited, Newcastle upon Tyne.

John had another interesting brother Francis or Frank Bianchi born 10th June 1898. Frank was 15 years old when he enlisted in 1914 for 4 years in the Territorial Force, although he claimed to be 17 years old. He was attached to the 5th Battalion of the Northumberland Fusiliers. His Army record shows that he served from the 21st of May 1914 to the 5th of February 1915. Searching for his Army service record online tells us that he was discharged from the army due to…

“Having been claimed by parent [unreadable word] para 392 VI (a) Kings Regs”

Paragraph 392 VI (a) of the Kings Regulations states

“Having made a mis-statement as to age on enlistment-soldier under 17 years of age at date of application for discharge-The C.O. after satisfying himself that the birth certificate produced refers to the soldier in question, will proceed with the discharge.”

We also promised you a resolution to the case and it comes to us from the editor of the Daily Chronicle, a Fleet Street publication. Who in February of 1919 received an anonymous letter purporting to give the name of the killer. A copy of the letter is contained in the file and is reproduced for you below.

Ref [NRO 12789]

The police in Morpeth, North and South Shields, Newcastle and Blyth looked through what they called their “Aliens Register” to try and find the person named in the letter and the response came back that they

“Have not such a name registered and cannot hear that such a person as ever been in their towns.”

So sorry to lead you up the garden path on that one, but unfortunately the unsolved murder is still unsolved.

John Thomas Bianchi’s funeral was held at Benton cemetery on February the 2nd 1919, six days after he was shot. Newspapers of the day report that there were “hundreds of sympathisers”

Photograph of The Illustrated Chronicle courtesy of Newcastle Libraries. https://www.newcastle.gov.uk/services/libraries-culture/libraries-newcastle/city-library

So, in conclusion what have we learned from the police file? We know that several witnesses saw a man on the lonnin just before the incident, including Elizabeth Philipson who survived the attack and could have identified the man. We know that the weapon he used was issued to the submarine E40 in 1917 and that the killer made off over fields in a southerly direction from the shooting. We know that the police pursued a number of lines of enquiry including mistaken identity and ultimately, we know that a young man tragically lost his life. What we don’t know, of course, is why.

Please note that the file about the murder and assault at Bigges Main is currently uncatalogued so is not yet available to the public in the Study Centre.

Murder At Bigges Main: Part Three

Welcome back to our series of blogs on the murder at Bigges Main in 1919. Last time we looked at the theory of mistaken identity as a motive for the murder of John Thomas Bianchi and the assault on Elizabeth Phillipson. We also looked how the investigation moved to the E40 submarine.

This time, let us have a look at the route that John and Elizabeth were taking on the night of the shooting, and the route that the shooter took when fleeing the scene.

We know that John was escorting Elizabeth from his house in Chapel Row, Bigges Main to her place of work at Walkergate Hospital. The close-up image below is from the 1952 edition of Ordnance Survey maps and shows the highlighted route the pair would have taken. Setting out from Bigges Main village in a south westerly direction the lonnin bisects open fields towards the recreation ground. They would have been aiming for, what is now known as, and recorded on the map as Benfield Road (then called Benton Road). Just south of what local witnesses called the three arch bridge and onto the hospital on that road.

Ref NZ 26 NE

From Elizabeth’s statement she describes walking along the “Walker lonan” [1]when about 200 yards along the road” she saw a man standing on the outside of the footpath and “when we were about two or three yards from him, he swung round and fired a shot.”

This information tells us that the shooter had only a very quick view of the pair and, bearing in mind that it was about a quarter to ten at night in January, and the lane was unlit, the view he would have got would have been very poor indeed. So, was he relying more on his hearing than his sight to identify his target? Or had he already observed them, perhaps further up the footpath? Or had he followed their routine on previous nights?

Elizabeth’s statement continues…

“I screamed and run round the man towards the Benton Road when he seized me by the shoulder, pulling me round, he then struck me in the corner of the left eye and I fell to the ground.”

Perhaps this description gives us a clue to the assailant, was he right-handed? If he held the gun in his right hand and went to hit Elizabeth, he would have naturally struck her in the left side of her face.

To hear how he made his escape let’s have a look at another piece of evidence and this time we are using a contemporary report in the newspaper. The Newcastle Daily Journal dated 29th January 1919 reports an interview with Elizabeth in which they claim she says,

“Dazed, I fell to the ground and feigned death. Next I heard a sound, as though he were jumping the fence, and, looking up found the man had crossed into the field.”

Elizabeth says she would know the man again by his back, as he was of a particularly solid build and positive his back would be unmistakable. The same publication claims to follow the route the murderer took from articles left behind, firstly the gun, then the newspaper claims that cartridges were found towards a reservoir and more still towards Walkergate hospital.

The same publication, two days later, interviews Charles Finlayson, the first person on the scene who helped carry John to his father’s cottage about 200 yards from where the shooting took place. Through Finlayson we hear some of John’s last words.  John asked about the man who came from the direction of “Cartman’s” and returned the same way. The paper explains that “Cartman’s” is a cottage very near to the Benton Road end of the lane. Indeed, searching the 1921 census a family by the name of Cartman were still living at White Cottage, near Walker Gate, almost at the junction of the lonnin and Benton Road.  Finlayson tells the Journal that the man is thought to have made off in the direction of Walkergate Hospital across a ploughed field.

Newcastle Daily Chronicle dated the of 20th February 1919 however reports from the inquest and quotes the deceased as saying the man had gone towards “Carville” is this a mis-hearing of Cartman’s? Or vice versa? Carville station was a railway station on the riverside loop of the Newcastle and North Shields railway. The loop ran between Byker and Willington Quay serving the heavy industry of the Tyne. From the scene of the murder escaping southeast over the fields you would naturally arrive at Wallsend Station on the main Newcastle to Tynemouth line before reaching the loop line and Carville station.

The staff of fourteen local inns or hotels were interviewed, conductresses on the Newcastle Corporation trams and the ticket collector at Walkergate Railway station were also interviewed but no one reported seeing any suspicious men that evening.

There are many witness statements in the file who did see a man in the “lonnin” around the time of the shooting, they describe the location in relation to the three-arch bridge. Rosy Cottage is mentioned by some, as pistol cartridges were found 50 yards north of Rosy Cottage stuffed into a hedge and others lying in the field adjacent to the hedge cache. One witness says she saw a man standing on the outside of the footpath just as Elizabeth said,

outside of the footpath just as Elizabeth said,

“opposite the little white gate leading into the old football field”.

She estimates the time of the shooting as about 9.45 pm, the same time as Elizabeth states.

Another witness saw a man at about 9:20pm midway between White Cottage (where the Cartmans lived) and Bigges Main and then claims to have seen the same man on the 8th of February pacing up and down outside the Colliery Engine Inn at Walkergate. The pub was at the junction of Shields Road and Benton Road/Benfield Road, just off the bottom left of the map above and very close to both the Walkergate hospital and the scene of the shooting. Unfortunately, the Colliery Engine Inn was not one of the pubs where staff were interviewed.

Another witness says that at about 8pm near the end of the gardens adjoining Cross Row, Bigges Main he passed a man who turned his face as the witness approached and the witness said that “I think I will know the man again” he was with another witness whose statement is very similar to his friends but added that the man had dark eyebrows. All the other witnesses have stated the man was wearing a cap so there has been no prior indication as to hair colour. Another clue then, we are perhaps looking for a man with dark eyebrows, and therefore perhaps dark hair?

Another witness says about 9:40pm she was walking with her “young man” from Walkergate to Bigges Main and saw a man opposite the football field and she says that he

“looked at us as if he wanted to see who we were.”

When they were at the end of Strawberry Terrace, Bigges Main she heard a shot, about two minutes after they had passed the man.

The gun was found 160 yards direct south of where the shooting took place according to PC James Sweeney’s statement, this perhaps shows the shooters direction of travel. PC Craghill states he found the gun and magazine cartridges partially concealed in a bush in a field. Possibly stashed to be collected at some time in the future?

So, we can see that there were a number of witnesses who saw a man on the lonnin just before the shooting some of who seemed to get a good clear look at him, but still the murderer could not be identified. So, the police tried another tactic. We have in the file the agenda item of the Standing Joint Committee meeting on the 3rd of February 1919 where it is agreed to issue a reward for information.

A poster was printed and issued as follows.

The Chief Constable of Durham County 150 copies, Newcastle City 50 copies, Gateshead Borough 30 copies, Tynemouth borough 20 copies, South Shields Borough 30 copies, Sunderland borough 30 copies, Hartlepool borough 20 copies, Middlesborough 30 copies and the River Tyne Police 10 copies.

One of those copies survives and is in the file, see the photo below.

Ref [NRO 12789]

Did this tactic work? Join us next time for our fourth and final blog in this series, where the identity of the killer is finally revealed.

Please note that the file about the murder and assault at Bigges Main is currently uncatalogued so is not yet available to the public in the Study Centre.

[1] A lonnin, according to Heslop’s glossary of words used in the County of Northumberland and on the Tyneside is “a lane, a narrow road”.

BERWICK NEWSPAPERS

BERWICK JOURNAL, 28TH FEBRUARY 1924

LORD ARMSTRONG SELLS LIFE POLICIES

It is understood, says “London Express,” that the peer whose life policies, amounting to £320,000, were sold by auction on Thursday for £104,910, is Lord Armstrong, of Bamburgh and Cragside, North Northumberland. He is a great-nephew of famous founder of shipbuilding and armament firm of Armstrong, Whitworths, on Tyne, at Elswick, and he was at one time a director of the firm. Lord Armstrong resigned that position in Feb., 1908.

Lord Armstrong did not succeed his great uncle in the title, but he was heir. First Lord Armstrong left a fortune of the gross value of £1,399,946, and by his will he bequeathed all his real estate, household effects as heirlooms, and all live and dead stock to his great nephew (who was created Baron Armstrong in 1903), and his heirs entail. Residue of the estate, after payment of a number of bequests and annuities, was left in trust to his great nephew for life, with the remainder to his children. Present Lord Armstrong took active interest in a number of ventures that were unsuccessful. He also interested himself financially in a number of syndicates, including an early wireless telegraphy undertaking, a drug and drink cure enterprise, mining and oil scheme.

Permission to sell heirlooms was given by the Courts to Lord Armstrong in 1910. The pictures and drawings realised £29,032. Further interest in his financial affairs was aroused last year when he announced that he was closing Cragside, famous Northumberland estate of the family, and was going to live at “The Cottage,” formerly the residence of his estate agent in the grounds.

There was considerable speculation (says “Graphic”) as to ownership of insurance policies for sums amounting with bonuses to upwards of £320,000 “on the life of a nobleman born on May 3, 1863,” sold by auction by Messrs H.E. Foster and Cranfield, of Poultry, London, realising in all the sum of £104,910. It was stated this is the biggest block of policies on a single life that has ever been offered publicly in London.

“Who is the nobleman?” people were asking for, even in these days of heavy taxation, a transaction of this size was so unusual as to give rise to curiosity. The auctioneers had not disclosed his identity. “He is travelling abroad for his health,” was all the information they gave.

I am able to say the nobleman is Lord Armstrong, whose great uncle, first Lord Armstrong spent nearly a million on the restoration of historic Bamburgh Castle, rare pile formerly the home of Tom Forster and Dorothy Forster, of Jacobite fame, frowning from an eminence over North Sea. Cragside, too, is one of England’s show places. It is built on a site of surpassing loveliness and was regarded by the old shipbuilder as the masterpiece of his career. It was into this heritage that the 2nd Lord Armstrong entered some 23 years ago.

For many years Lord Armstrong has been the patron of good causes in London and the North of England. His generosity was proverbial. He heaped splendid benefactions on Durham College of Science at Newcastle, which was then rebuilt and re-named Armstrong College, and he gave £100,000 to Newcastle Infirmary. He also gave generously to London hospitals. Appeals for help, and for personal assistance, were seldom made to him in vain.

His son and heir, imbued with the same philanthropic desires as his father, astonished his friends early in life by becoming violently Socialistic. The last time I heard from him he was Vancouver Correspondent of “Montreal Star,” and he told me he was working 10 hours a day.

It was in Feb., 1923, announcement was made that Lord Armstrong of Cragside, and Bamburgh, had gone to live in a “cottage” in consequence of burden of present day taxation.

I have been much surprised (wrote Lord Armstrong at the time) at the exceptional interest aroused by my closing the Mansion-house at Cragside, and retiring to the smaller house in the grounds which was for some years occupied by my late steward.

For many other landowners have been compelled from motives of enforced economy to adopt a similar course- where indeed they have not been forced to take the more drastic and tragic alternative of selling their ancestral acres, and thus in many cases severing lifelong associations with a district hallowed to them by friendships and mutual goodwill and by cordial relations with all classes of their neighbours.

The reason for the step that I have taken may shortly be stated to arise from the desire “to make ends meet,” a not unworthy ambition, though apparently one less esteemed by governments and public than it was in the old days before the war. Among the causes that have led to this decision I may enumerate the following: –

  1. The very heavy income-tax which takes 9s 6d in the pound (last year it was 10s 6d) off my rent roll, though that remains the same as it was in pre-war days.
  2. The tithe that I pay now amounts to about 1s in the pound, which is more than 100 per cent. Increase on the pre-war amount.
  3. Estate wages, which before the war amounted to from 21s to 26s a week, with house and coal, now reach from 42s to 50s a week, with similar perquisites, in spite of which increase I believe that my estate staff is less well off now than formerly.
  4. All rates have largely increased.
  5. Increased management expenses.

These items, together with the great increase in the cost of the necessary upkeep of farms and cottages, absorb most of the income from my landed estates.

The, with reference to my personal estate, my income from industries, in which I am largely interested, has roughly decreased since the war by two-thirds, while interest on mortgages has increased by 1½ per cent., and in some cases 2 per cent. I am further mulcted by the injustice of having to pay super-tax on my insurance premiums.

I would further point out with all these reductions from my rent-roll that charges on the estate for pensions and allowances naturally remain the same. It is for these reasons that I have been compelled to forego the upkeep of a large domestic establishment such as a house the size of Cragside entails.

An aerial view of Cragside, near Rothbury, and its surrounding area. This picture was taken in 1910, From the high angle it shows the Coquet Valley, Coquetdale. This photograph is part of a larger collection taken by local commercial photographer John Worsnop. John Worsnop took over the Rothbury based family photographic business in 1874. NRO 01449/541

I am aware that a similar complaints have frequently been published before, though they seem to have fallen upon deaf ears if one can judge by the immense number of begging letters with which I have been inundated since I made this announcement.

These appeals come from all quarters of the British Isles and the Continent, and are of a varied description. Some ask for gifts and loans varying in amount from a few pounds to hundreds; others propose that I should join them in mercantile adventures; and I receive invitations to set up in life young couples anxious to enter the state of matrimony-all of which present a pitiful though curious phase in human psychology.

In conclusion, I should like to add that I can see but little hope for landowners and their dependants, or for the survival of those honourable traditions which have for so long been associated with land tenure in this country, unless in the near future we have a substantial reduction in the burden of taxation.

Failing this relief, estates will, of necessity, be constantly changing hands. Though many of the new owners will prove worthy successors to their predecessors, in the majority of cases the estates will fall into the hands of land speculators who will care nothing for the welfare of the people dwelling thereon, while their sole object will be personal gain, thus bringing blight and disaster on our countryside.

North Northumbrians will be interested to learn that a new but flourishing company has been founded in British Columbia by Capt. Hon. William Watson-Armstrong, son of Lord Armstrong, aim of which is importation of high grade British manufactured good, and also establishment of import and export business with Ceylon, India, and countries of the Orient. The concern, which is registered under name of Messrs William W. Armstrong and Co., 912, Birks Buildings, Vancouver, has agencies for several, British firms. For 2 years Capt. Armstrong was on staff of “Vancouver Sun.” With him in partnership is Mr A. O. Barratt, also a Northumbrian. Capt. Armstrong, who was born in Oct., 1892, is now 31, and was an Officer in 7th N.F. He gained a First Class in Part II. of Historical Tripos at Cambridge. His University career was most successful. Previously he was placed in 1st Division of 2nd Class of Inter-Collegiate Examination in History, and in Part I. of Historical Tripos. He won Bowen Prize of his College for Modern History.