The search room at Woodhorn will be closing at 3pm between 17/6/26 and 26/6/26. This is to allow for essential building works.

BERWICK BRIDGE

Berwick Bridge, or the Old Bridge as it is known by local people, is an impressive structure which spans the River Tweed. Built of sandstone, it consists of 15 arches, is 355 metres long and the 6th pier from the Berwick side originally formed the border between Berwick and North Durham/ Northumberland. Why was the bridge built and what is its history ?

The Old Bridge

Whilst travelling south in 1603 to be crowned King of England, King James VI of Scotland, passed through Berwick and crossed Berwick Bridge. At that time it was a wooden structure, slightly further upstream to the present one and he wasn’t impressed. These wooden bridges were liable to damage and total destruction by floods on the river which had happened on a number of occasions. Following various petitions by the town and the intervention of George Home, Earl of Dunbar, it was finally agreed that a new permanent stone structure, funded by the Crown, would be built at Berwick. This bridge was a necessity for the town but for James, it was also a permanent and visible symbol of the link between his two kingdoms.

Work began on the bridge’s construction on 19 June 1611 and it is fitting that just over 410 years later, it has been re-opened to pedestrians and traffic again, a vital link across the lower reaches of the River Tweed. As the building of the bridge was to be funded by the Crown – £8000 was offered – but the expenditure was to be initially incurred by the town, it was important to keep detailed and accurate accounts. Amazingly these accounts still survive within the town’s Borough Archives kept at the Berwick Record Office. They provide a unique record and insight into who was employed and what materials were used to build such a structure in the days before mass mechanisation.

Berwick Bridge account book, 6 Sept. 1611 (Ref : BA/G/2/13/258)

From these records, it is possible to glean some wonderful details which show how labour intensive the project was and also where the materials came from. All those employed are listed on a weekly basis, including their occupation, daily rate of pay and how many days they worked. The highest paid was James Burrell, the Surveyor of the Works (2 s 6d per day ) followed by John Shell (16d per day) Normally the men worked 6 days a week and there were different rates of pay depending on their seniority within their trade. For example, in the week starting 7 September 1611, a master mason was paid 20 d (18p) per day whilst an apprentice was only paid 6d.

Berwick Bridge account book – masons employed, 13 Sept. 1611 (Ref : BA/G/2/13/258).

Other trades employed that week included carpenters, smiths, quarrymen, labourers and boys. It’s not clear what the 8 boys had to do but they were paid 4d per day. In addition money was paid out to carry stones by water from the quarry in Tweedmouth to the bridge as well as for coals and oyster shells. The latter were used as the basis for lime mortar. In total. £25 14s 11 ¾ d was spent that week equivalent to about £7000 today. Other trades found in the accounts were lightermen, shipwrights and sawyers.

Berwick Bridge account book reference to oyster shells , 13 Sept. 1611. (Ref : BA/G/2/13/258 )

Not all the supplies used in the construction were sourced locally. Timber was made available from the Royal Forest in Chopwell, transported down the River Tyne from Blaydon to Newcastle and then brought by ship to Berwick.

Cost of transporting timber from Chopwell to Newcastle and then Berwick, 1611. (Ref : BA/G/2/13/258).

Coal, iron and lead were also shipped to Berwick and in March 1612 , a ship carrying them developed a leak and grounded on the sands entering the channel at the mouth of the River Tweed. Labourers were employed to remove the cargo and then transport it by horse to the storehouse.

Costs for labourers and mariners assisting the ship, March 1612 (Ref : BA/G/2/13/258).

By May 1617, the town had spent the initial £8000 but the Bridge still wasn’t finished. They petitioned the King for additional funds and an extra £5000 was granted. Work on the Bridge was going so slowly that by 1620, the Bishop of Durham got involved. It was agreed that the remaining work would be undertaken by contract for a set sum. This led to an agreement , signed on 12 October 1620 by the Bishop of Durham and amongst others, James Burrell and Lancelot Branxton, the master mason, agreeing to make the bridge passable to traffic by the summer of 1621. Work continued and progress was made but unfortunately in October 1621 disaster struck. The river flooded so badly that it destroyed all the work undertaken in the previous year and they were back to square one. Work started again in the following spring and by 1625/6 much of it had been completed and the bridge could be used. However, there were still bits and pieces to do because the final accounts and the work were not signed off until 24 October 1634. In the end, the final cost of the structure was almost £15,000, a huge amount for the time.

Etching of Berwick Bridge, 19th century

Since then the bridge has not only been a vital link between the communities of Berwick and Tweedmouth but also until 1928, part of the main road link between London and Edinburgh, forming part of the Great North Road (A1). As time went on, the bridge became less suitable for the traffic using it on a daily basis. By 1896, the Town Council had received petitions requesting it to be widened – market days were particularly difficult with people bringing their cattle into town from the south or trying to take them out again. They said – “We think the Bridge could be widened sufficiently to provide footpaths that would obviate the necessity of persons walking in the Roadway and at the same time, perhaps widen the Roadway too”

Petition from farmers for widening of Bridge, 1896 Ref : BA/C/SA

The thought of destroying the ancient structure resulted in a counter petition from the Conservationists – “Berwick Bridge is without doubt the most interesting structure of its kind and date in Great Britain, not only from its antiquity and historical importance, though in these respects it is remarkable – but on account of its picturesque position and extreme beauty from every point of view. Any alteration such as is proposed would in our opinion fatally destroy the appearance and greatly injure the character of this unique Bridge which is such an ornament to your ancient town of Berwick and which we all feel to be a national inheritance.”

Petition from the Conservationists, 1896 . Ref : BA/C/SA

Altering the bridge was continually discussed in the early 1900s and by 1914, there was interest in building a new replacement bridge over the River Tweed. However, the First World War put paid to those plans. The question was revived again in 1924 when Berwick Town Council, Northumberland County Council and the Ministry of Transport finally agreed that a new bridge was a necessity not only for Berwick but for ease of transport on a national road. This led to the construction of the Royal Tweed Bridge which was finally opened in May 1928 by Edward, Prince of Wales. This Bridge was to take the main bulk of the traffic and became the A1 until the early 1980s when the Berwick by-pass was opened. However, the Old Bridge as it became known could still be used by vehicles and pedestrians.

Postcard of Old Bridge and Royal Tweed Bridge, post 1928. Ref : BRO 426/93

The Old Bridge continued to take two way traffic but it was dangerous for drivers and pedestrians. I well remember driving across the bridge, meeting a car coming in the opposite direction and wondering if there was enough room for both of us. After an experiment in the late 1990s/early 2000s the Bridge was made one way, only taking traffic out of Berwick.

It’s a testament to its construction that the Bridge has been in use for nearly 400 years. However, over time, it has needed repairs and the most recent ones have just been completed. In late 2020 to mid 2021, Northumberland County Council have undertaken the first phase of ongoing repair work on this Jacobean structure. The Bridge has been closed to traffic and work has been carried out on waterproofing the bridge deck, re-laying the road surface and pedestrian footpaths, repairing some of the masonry parapets and installing new LED lights. The second and third phases will involve work on the arches and piers.

Work on the carriageway, 7 May 2021. Credit : Kevin Graham

Berwick’s Bridges are iconic and very much a feature of its landscape and its heritage. It’s fitting that Berwick Bridge , the oldest bridge on the Lower Tweed is being repaired to ensure it longevity for future generations.

Cllr Catherine Seymour, Berwick Archivist, Friends and volunteers of the Berwick Archives and Ross Straughan, Northumberland County Council apprentice mark the 410th anniversary of starting work on the Bridge, 19 June 2021

Punishment Books

When I was in primary school, children were ‘given the sandshoe’ if they were naughty. The nervous child would lie over the teachers knee & would be whacked with a black canvas gym shoe. When I progressed to middle school, the chosen weapon was the black board duster! A certain ferocious teacher appeared to take great pleasure in throwing it at the head of any pupil who was talking in class. That thing would really hurt as it had a wooden edge, and you would often see children in the playground with a mark on their forehead and you instantly knew what lesson they had just come out of! 

Within our collection we hold numerous school punishment books as well as punishment books for the Netherton Training School [North Eastern Reformatory] and the Wellesley Training Ship (https://northumberlandarchives.com/test/2016/06/30/the-wellesley-training-ship/ 

The cane or tawse (leather strap with one end split into a number of tails) were two of the most popular implements used to punish children and young adults. After looking through some of the books it became evident that punishments were often unfair and inconsistent. One child received eight strokes of the cane on their posterior for stealing while another was given the same treatment for simply being absent from church. Inconsistencies like this were common throughout many of the books I viewed. 

Tawse NRO 11025

The tables below highlight some of the kinds of mischief juveniles ‘got up to’ and the type of punishment that was dispensed.  All the punishment books in our collection have a 100-year closure period to protect the identity of the individuals. No names of children or young adults will be given. 

Netherton Training School [North Eastern Reformatory] 

YEAR OFFENCE METHOD OF PUNISHMENT NUMBER OF STROKES  PART OF THE BODY  
1907 Picking a lock with a knife  Tawse Six Posterior 
1907 Destroying clothing  Cane Eight Hand 
1908 Personal indecency in bed  Tawse Eight Posterior 
1908 Suspicious conduct in bed  Cane Eight Hand 
1908 Dropping a weaker boy in a pig trough  Tawse Three Posterior 
1909 Scoffing at Jews  Cane Six Hand 
1909  Eating food out of the pig bucket  Cane Four Hand 
1914 Making up his wet bed knowing it to be wet after several warnings  Tawse Nine Posterior 

Wellesley Training Ship 

YEAR  OFFENCE METHOD OF PUNISHMENT NUMBER OF STROKES PART OF THE BODY 
1955 Absconding  Strap Six Posterior 
1955 Breaking Bounds whist on leave  Strap Eight Posterior 
1955 Brawling  Strap Four-Eight Posterior 
1955 Stealing  Strap Eight Posterior 
1956 Bullying Strap Six Posterior  
1958 Out of bounds at night  Strap Four Posterior 
1958 Smoking in dormitory Strap Four Posterior 

School Punishment Books 

SCHOOL YEAR OFFENCE METHOD OF PUNISHMENT NUMBER OF STROKES PART OF THE BODY  
Matfen County Primary 1901 Talking in class & copying  Strap One Hand 
Matfen County Primary 1908 Pouring water over a boy’s head  Strap Two Hand 
Amble St. Cuthbert’s Roman Catholic First School 1934 Careless & untidy work  Cane Two Hand 
Amble St. Cuthbert’s Roman Catholic First School  1938 Ungentlemanly behaviour towards a female teacher  Cane Four Hand 
Amble St. Cuthbert’s Roman Catholic First School  1969 Stealing from vending machine using plastic coins from the school  Cane Three Posterior 
Brown Rigg Camp School 1979 Attempting to punch a member of staff  Strap Two Posterior 
Brown Rigg Camp School 1979 Grafitti on desk  Strap One Hand 
Brown Rigg Camp School  1984 Stealing a sharp knife from domestic science room & throwing the knife at a boy, penetrating the skin & drawing blood Strap Two Hand 

It’s back to work we go…

While working from home I have had the opportunity to get to know some parts of the collection better than I would have if we had been in the office constantly over the last few months.  However, being able to open the doors again and welcome visitors back to do their research is what Northumberland Archives is ultimately about.  It is great being able to re-connect with colleagues and visitors on a face-to-face basis – even if that is behind layers of PPE and with a 2 metre gap! 

At the Woodhorn site we re-opened in May, with staff returning a couple of weeks beforehand in their bubbles to start preparation.  The work of the Archives Assistant begins only after our visitor has booked a timeslot to visit and had a discussion with an archivist about the availability of the documentation that they are interested in.  In our bubbles, one team is responsible for retrieving items and the other for returning them, this allows for both secure storage and maintaining quarantine guidelines.  It is more time consuming than it sounds, ensuring the correct item is located involves checking and checking again as any errors cannot be put right on the day. Everything has to be labelled so it is clear who has requested what, and who handled items last, not just the individual document but also the box or shelf it was removed from.  After months of sitting at home, going up and down the stepladders and lifting boxes feels like a much-needed visit to the gym!  The frequent cleaning of workspaces after use by colleagues and visitors is a new and necessary part of our role too.  Safety is paramount. 

The return to the office also means that we too can look at items within the shelves.  We are encouraged to find things of interest and to share information about the county and its people with our social media followers.   The long list of things that have peaked our individual interests over the last few months will finally get reviewed.  So, keep your eyes open as hopefully some that will make its way online soon.