Archives from the Attic; The Thomas John Armstrong Papers.

Charles Armstrong, born about 1800 at Heddon on the Wall in Northumberland, worked as a Land Steward on various estates in County Durham. At some time around 1860 he established his family home and a business as a Land Agent in Hawthorn Terrace, Elswick, Newcastle upon Tyne. The house would be the family’s home for about 100 years, but Charles’ tenure was short; in 1868 he died and the business was continued by his two youngest sons, Thomas John Armstrong, then only 18 and Robert Lamb Armstrong, then 16.  Later practising under the name of T. & R. Armstrong, they worked for a number of large local land owners as well as taking commissions in County Durham, Cumberland and farther afield. Robert died in 1889 but Thomas continued, perhaps into his seventies.

It seems as if Thomas never threw anything away; as papers became redundant he deposited them in the attic or a disused coach house, the work of 50 to 60 years resulting in a vast accumulation of documents, accounts, maps and plans as well as personal papers. The collection also includes a large quantity of the business papers of Robert Nicholson (1808-1855) and his half-nephew John Furness Tone (1822-1881), Civil Engineers, of Newcastle upon Tyne. Their consulting practice was active from about 1830 to about 1880, specialising mainly in railways but also undertaking various dock, harbour and water works. After Nicholson’s death, the practice was continued by John Tone. For the next 14 or so years he maintained an astonishing workload. His railway works extended to Somerset and Devon but here he became involved in projects with shaky finance and poor management who could or would not pay his fees. In 1869 he was declared bankrupt and, although discharged in a few months, this seems to have heralded a general decline in his activities. In 1879 he was declared bankrupt again and he died in 1881, after a long illness and in reduced circumstances.

How and why these papers were taken over by Thomas Armstrong remains a mystery. No evidence has been found to show that Thomas Armstrong ever worked professionally with John Tone, although he may have done so. The only proven link is that they were both Freemasons.

It appears that after Thomas’ death in 1927, all the papers were left undisturbed, although it is possible that the practice was continued by Thomas’ son Robert. After Thomas’s widow Annie died in 1961, her three children, all unmarried and still living in the Elswick house, offered the collection to Newcastle City and the bulk of it was transferred in 1963 and 1964, after which the family moved to Hexham. In 1966 the collection was offered to and accepted by  the Northumberland Archives and was then described as “…rather scattered, about 5 tin trunks (mostly plans) at the Old Town Hall and a large pile of volumes and some more tin trunks at Saville Place”. Later it was described as being “an extremely large collection, in an extremely dirty condition and a very confused state.”  These assessments have been confirmed by recent work; time has not been kind to the archive. Some of the documents have been damaged by water, some are too fragile to unwrap or unroll, ‘bookworms” have bored through bound volumes and some boxes contain mouse droppings. Soot or coal dust coats many items.

Some cataloguing was done in the 1970s but some general sorting and listing was carried out in 1981 and a paper catalogue from this era on is available at Northumberland Archives and is on-line at www.discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk  Recently all of the Nicholson-Tone papers have been re-catalogued in much more detail and work is now in progress on some large uncatalogued collections of maps and plans which include much Ordnance Survey material as well as Parliamentary Plans for various public works and engineering drawings. In spite of the poor condition of many items, the collection as whole is a valuable archive of the work of two nineteenth century professional practices in Newcastle.

An extract from a plan by Robert Nicholson showing proposed docks at North Shields in connection with the Newcastle and North Shields Railway, 1833. The plan is badly stained by water but still legible.

 

Henry Norton of Hexham – The Last Civil War Soldier?

The Northumberland Quarter Sessions files contain four surviving petitions to Justices of the Peace from old royalist soldiers of the British Civil Wars. These provide valuable evidence of how people looked back on this terrible conflict. The latest one is from Henry Norton of ‘Turfe House’ in Hexham, aged ‘near upon 90 years’, which was presented to the Midsummer Sessions at Hexham in July 1710. This made Henry among the very last soldiers from this conflict who was still alive. He may have been living in a house with a turf roof, or a hamlet in Hexham parish named after such a structure.

In his petition, Henry claimed to have borne arms for King Charles I ‘of blessed memory’. Henry’s three sons had left to join ‘the Queen’s service’, and were probably fighting in Europe under the command of the Duke of Marlborough. This, he claimed, had left him in ‘miserable and deplorable circumstances’, wanting friends, and utterly dependent upon ‘the charitable help of well-disposed persons’. For good measure, he added that he had always ‘been of a good life & Conversation & a True Member of ye high Church of England’. This was likely a calculated appeal to the Tory Justices on the County Bench. Henry did not sign his petition himself, and it is likely that it was prepared for him by a literate acquaintance in the parish, possibly the minister or churchwarden. The narratives in petitions like Henry Norton’s demonstrate the strategies and language used by claimants and their sponsors in order to appear as deserving cases to Justices and other authorities.

 

QSB/32/28
Petition of Henry Norton of Turfe House, Hexham, July 1710

 

Henry’s petition was successful. On 12 July 1710, Northumberland’s Justices at the Hexham Sessions ordered the churchwardens and overseers of Hexham to provide Henry with eight pence per week towards his maintenance. This was a pitiful sum, but still very much worth the effort to obtain to help him get by in his last years. The stories of old soldiers like Henry Norton, and those of the Civil War’s widows and orphans too, are being uncovered by a new Arts and Humanities Research Council-funded project, entitled ‘Conflict, Welfare and Memory during and after the English Civil Wars 1642-1710’.

Reproduction of the Seal of the Parliamentary Committee for Maimed Soldiers (1640s), courtesy of Dr Eric Gruber von Arni

 

The project team is drawn from the Universities of Leicester, Nottingham, Cardiff and Southampton. Its free-access project website will be launched on 26 July 2018 at the National Civil War Centre, Newark Museum in Nottinghamshire. It will contain images and transcriptions of the petitions and certificates submitted by maimed soldiers and war widows in order to claim military pensions. These stretch from the 1640s to as late as 1710 (Henry Norton’s is the latest one so far discovered), and will include examples from Northumberland. We are very grateful for the co-operation of The National Archives and the county record offices of England and Wales, without which this project would not be possible.

The project’s research builds on the inaugural conference at the National Civil War Centre that produced a temporary exhibition there entitled ‘Battle-Scarred’ which examined medical care and military welfare during and after the Civil Wars. The exhibition remains in situ until the autumn and free exhibition brochures are available there to visitors. A collected volume of essays, entitled Battle-Scarred and based on the proceedings of the conference is available with Manchester University Press from July 2018: http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526124807/

Maybe there are things we might still learn today about care and welfare for those wounded, maimed and worn out by war from this landmark moment in our Civil-War past?

http://www.civilwarpetitions.ac.uk

 

 

 

 

The Alnwick Abductions

A Gentleman Esq

William Beresford Orde Lisle was born on June 25th 1886 at 50 Jermyn Street, London. His father, Bertram Lisle, was a barrister-at-law from Alnwick and his mother, Jane Lucinda, was a Australian lady. William grew up between the family home in Jermyn Street, London and Brainshaugh House, Northumberland. Following his father’s untimely demise in 1893 William appears to have floated between various relatives. In 1908 he gave his address as being Bailiffgate, Alnwick the previous home of William Beresford Lisle (potentially his grandfather) who had died in 1903 leaving an estate of £1869 19s 11d. Evidence shows that William the younger received consecutive (and extremely substantial) inheritances from numerous well-placed family members. But William, despite being the wealthy son of barrister, squandered this money and repeatedly found himself on the wrong side of the law.

 

William Beresford Orde Lisle, as drawn by a court sketch artist (1908). Reference NRO 11343 B/DAT/26

His vast fortune brought with it the temptation of fast cars, alcohol and women. His escapades and wild behaviours often saw him placed before the magistrates, where he was regularly defended by the Dickson, Archer and Thorp legal firm. The firm’s partners were very close to William’s family and had kept amongst their personal papers a scrapbook filled with the crimes and lives of Alnwick folk, now held by the Northumberland Archives. Recorded within this book were the criminal adventures of William himself, including a play-by-play account of one of his most infamous jaunts.

Abduction

William’s most scandalous crime by far was a spontaneous road-trip, taken during the summer of 1907. It involved drink driving, an international gun-fight and the abduction of two girls from an Alnwick Street. The girls in question were Louisa Rose Whittle and Theresa Roper. Louisa was a fifteen year old servant girl who, on the 23rd June 1907, was walking in Alnwick with her friend Theresa, then aged seventeen. Both girls were stopped by Lisle who asked if they would like to have a ride in a motor car. Both girls agreed to the short drive, as subsequent news reports published after the abduction explained “the temptation to drive in a motor car was to the child very great.” They were possibly encouraged to join the journey due to the presence of another female in the car (who was either Lisle’s controversial wife Amy or his regular female companion Violet Green alias Eva Green).

 

Reports on the abduction court case, as recorded in the scrapbook belonging to the Dickson, Archer and Thorp Collection. NR0 11343 B/DAT/26

 

Lisle’s offer of a short motor ride soon turned into the journey from hell. In the upcoming months Lisle would face a court accused of abduction, and the two girls would give damning evidence against the social-flyer. They claimed Lisle appeared to have consumed alcohol prior to making his offer, and that once the girls were in the car he directed the driver to go onto the Plough (a pub.) The gentlewomen who had accompanied the group then left the car at the Plough and did not return. The remaining passengers then went onto drink in the public houses of Alnmouth and Newcastle.

Following a heady drinking session Lisle took the girls to a different town – one they had never seen before. This turn of events frightened the girls, who now requested to be returned home. The prosecution theorised that this unknown place was probably Durham, although Lisle contested and claimed it was actually Morpeth.

 

A court cartoon from the 1908 court appearance, Reference: NRO 11343 B/DAT/26

 

The girls, far from home and in an unfamiliar place, began to panic. They found a policeman, to whom they complained about their treatment and requested to be taken back to Alnwick. But the policeman simply laughed and refused to believe their story. They were forced to return to Lisle’s side as he took them onto Darlington, where the group spent a night in a hotel. The following day Lisle instructed the driver to return them to Newcastle and, once back in Northumberland, Lisle hired another car and driver to take himself and the girls onto York. On the third day the group went to Huntingdon and, having spent the night here, Lisle exclaimed “You are seeing life, you must see London too.”

London was one of Lisle’s favourite haunts. He had a tendency during his teenage years of repeatedly running away from his boarding school to seek adventures in the capital. Once in London Lisle bought both girls new hats having previously “jumped on their own ones,” possibly during a fit of rage or drunkeness. At this point Lisle became “sickened” of Louisa, the youngest of the two, and, without allowing Theresa to say goodbye, put Louisa on a train back to Newcastle. Theresa and Lisle then went onto Dover, where he told her that they were about to board a boat “for Alnwick.” The boat actually took the couple to Brussels, where he proceeded to extract £400 and drink heavily.

In Ostend he tried to persuade Theresa to share her room with him. When she refused and rebuffed his advances he fired his revolver in a public house, scattering the patrons within. Frightened by his behaviour, and having never been away from her Northumbrian home, Theresa begged Lisle to give her some money and allow her to leave. However he brutally refused, telling her she would “starve” instead. Exasperated with her treatment Roper plotted her own escape; she waited until he was distracted and ran from him. She later claimed to have entered seven shops, but found no one understood her as she attempted to explain her plight. Dazed and frightened she fainted. When she awoke someone had brought her to the British Vice-Consul, she was eventually sent home and upon her return remained ill in bed for three weeks.

Court

Meanwhile Louisa’s parents, horrified at her disappearance, insisted she was examined by a doctor. They refused to believe that nothing “immoral” had occurred between the the girls and Lisle, but the examining doctor was able to confirm that the young girl had been telling the truth and nothing had occurred. Still enraged Louisa’s parents planned to take Lisle to court upon his return to England.

Likewise Theresa’s father, Mr Robert Roper, also took Lisle to court. Because Lisle had taken the girl further then London Mr Roper insisted his daughter gave damning evidence before the judge. In her examination before the court she complained that Lisle had refused to take the girls home, despite them becoming increasingly distressed as the days rolled on. She also said he had repeatedly tried to share a room with the girls but that they had stood firm and refused him entry, something that was verified by the doctors.

 

Theresa Roper and her father, pictured at the 1908 court case. Reference NRO 11343 B/DAT/26

 

In both cases the girls were awarded large settlements, although one judge brushed off the seriousness of Lisle’s actions by calling the event a “prank” which had went terribly wrong. The court accused the girls of being too trusting of Lisle’s promises, and the subsequent public scandal must have had a profound impact upon their character and reputation. Barely three years later the girls elected to change their names, perhaps trying to obtain some level of anonymity, with Theresa becoming Dorothy and Louisa becoming Lizzie.

 

The information found in this blog has been extracted from original documents held in the Dickson, Archer and Thorp collection, as well as contemporary newspapers.