General

This Week in World War One, 23 August 1918

by

 

BERWICK ADVERTISER, 23 AUGUST 1918

 

Grandson of Holy Island Man’s Heroic Act

GIVES LIFE BLOOD FOR COMRADE

The war has produced many acts of heroism and gallantry. Among Britain’s citizen Army are found thousands of men with no outstanding characteristics but with the same stout heart and firm spirit, who reck not the danger when a comrade is to be dragged back from the grave. A story which has reached us gives further evidence of this fact. The hero of the episode is a young Northumberland Fusilier, who, literally, gave his life blood in order that a “chum” from overseas might regain his strength. That the effort was in vain is the only sad incident in the whole, which is bright with the steadfast courage shown.

Lance-Corporal John Markwell, Northumberland Fusiliers, grandson of Mr Ralph Markwell, Holy Island, Beal, and Private J. Hempshill, a son of Mrs Hempshill, 12 East Thomas St., Edinburgh, were lying in adjacent beds in a base hospital in France. Private Hempshill was severely wounded, and had lost an extra ordinary amount of blood, so much so, in fact, that the doctors came to the conclusion that unless some new life-giving fluid could be transfused from another living person the soldier would certainly die. Markwell, on being asked if he would submit to having some of his blood transfused, at once acceded, and this plan was at once carried out. The blood was removed from Markwell’s right arm to the left arm of Hemshill, but the operation had apparently been delayed too long, as success did not attend the efforts of the doctors. Hempshill died shortly afterwards, but before he passed away he asked that due recognition should be made of the heroic act of Lance Corporal Markwell. Almost his last statement was a request that a record of the incident should be published in the “Edinburgh Evening News.”

Lance-Corporal Markwell, it may be added, is at present in hospital in this country, and is making good progress. In writing to the mother of the deceased soldier he put the story in a nutshell, and expresses volumes when he modestly says, “I did my best.” No one could have done more.

 

BERWICK PETTY SESSIONS

THURSDAY

Before the Mayor, Alex. Darling, Chas. Morgan, T. Purves, and R. Boston, Esqrs.

THEFT OF SOAP

George Edward Wardle, Robert Patterson, and James Douglas, privates in the K.O.S.B., were charged, on remand, with having, on Saturday, stolen twenty two bars of soap, valued 14s, from a store in the yard of Mr John Stoddart, grocer, 84 High Street. The circumstances were fully reported at Monday’s Court, and to-day defendants all pleaded guilty, Capt. Collingwood was present and watched the proceedings.

John D. Patterson, a boy employed by Mr Stoddart, and P.C. Wm. Watt again gave similar evidence to that tendered at last Court. The soap, the latter said, was a considerable distance from the entrance door of the store, and could only have been taken by someone going right into the premises.

Capt. Collingwood said that two of the defendants had a clean sheet, while some minor fault was against the third man; but on the whole the defendants had given the military authorities no trouble.

Defendants each attributed their condition to the effects of taking drink.

The Mayor said that the Bench were very sorry to see the defendants in their present position, which was a very serious one. They took into consideration that the defendants had served their country and been wounded, and would therefore deal leniently by imposing a fine of 10s each, or seven days’ imprisonment. This was the first case of its kind which had come before the Court, and it was hoped it would act as an adequate warning, as shopkeepers and others must be protected from conduct of this kind. The fines were paid.

LOCAL NEWS

The demonstration of hooliganism and violence given by five soldiers, who, as reported in our columns of page 4, created a great disturbance on the Spittal Motor Ferry boat last Friday night, has made people in the town furiously to think of what protection is afforded from these “roughs.” Evidently as the police did not see the occurrence happen they are powerless to bring a case unless the assaulted parties issue summons.

(c) Berwick Record Office BRO 1887-2-4 Spittal Ferry

In a case of this kind no private individual cares to summon the offenders who in all probability would have their revenge as only “Redskins” can take it. Surely there is a kink in the law which forces one to come into the lime light of police court proceedings with the off chance of getting “done in” later, to protect oneself from having the experience of “kipper slapping” and rowdyism. The military no doubt will punish the offenders, but the feeling in the town is that a few months “hard labour” would do the culprits a considerable amount of good.

BERWICK TRIBUNALS

HAIRDRESSER TO SERVE

William D. McColgan, hairdresser, Hide Hill, Berwick, described as a Grade 1 man, was an application by the National Service Representative for withdrawal of the existing exemption, as he was not doing national work, and might be more usefully employed in some branch of the Army.

Mr McColgan stated that this was entirely a one man business, and he urged that exemption should be continued owing to domestic circumstances and a young family of four. He was in grade B2 last time.

The Tribunal decided that he should serve, but that he should not be called up till the end of September.

A LOW GRADED MAN

William Johnston (31) rope and twine spinner, residing in Coxon’s Lane, and employed by Mrs Wilson, Castlegate, was a Grade III, man. He had been fourteen years in her employment, and claimed on occupational grounds that he was useful in supplying the fishing industry, and in making material that was used in munitions. The only other man employed was about seventy years of age.

The National Service Representative – In view of this man’s grade and occupation I am not prepared to oppose his exemption.

The Tribunal accordingly allowed three months’ exemption.

 

BERWICK COMPANY CHURCH LADS’ BRIGADE

KING’S ROYAL RIFLE CORPS CADETS

 

This Company went into camp at Warkworth for the August Bank Holiday week. Berwick lads were attached to “D” Company, along with Blyth Company. About 400 lads were in camp under Cadet Lieut. Col. W. H. Arring.

The camp was conducted on lines of strict military discipline as the following account of the daily routine shows.

Saturday, the day of arrival, the lads were placed in their tents and acquainted with their camp duties.

Sunday, the battalion marched down to Warkworth Church at 7a.m., and a large number of the lads partook of the Holy Communion, the service being conducted by the Bishop of Newcastle. At 11 a.m. a short service was held in camp, and in the afternoon there was a drum head service with an address by the Bishop.

Warworth Church © Mick Knapton. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

The lads contributed liberally to the collection in aid of the Church Army Hut Work in France.

Daily reveille at 6 a.m., fall in at 6.30 for a short march and physical drill, breakfast at 8 a.m., C.O.’s parade at 10.30, consisting of company drill and battalion movements, dinner 1 p.m., after which the lads were free for the day. Excepting those who were detailed for guard, etc. tea at 4.30, and “light out” at 11 p.m.

A very noticeable feature in camp was the three minutes silence after reveille and lights out were sounded. The interval being devoted to prayers.

Wednesday was devoted to the Battalion sports, and Thursday was largely occupied with the inspection. The inspecting officer, who we understand came from the Tyne Garrison, and was sent by the General of the Northern Command, spoke highly of the smartness of the lads and complimented them on the way they marched past. He afterwards inspected the camp and was present at the distribution of prizes by Miss Deuchar.

On Friday everyone was busy doing his share in striking camp and leaving the field clean and tidy. Berwick boys arrived home on Friday afternoon, after having spent a most enjoyable and instructive week.

The Company, which will resume drills in September, bids fair, under the capable leadership of Lieut. R. D. Harvey to add lustre to its already noble history. Recruits will be enrolled any Wednesday evening at the Boy’s School, Ravensdowne.

 

Guilty or Innocent? The Trespassing Shepherd

by

BE IT REMEMBERED that on the seventh day of October, in the year of our Lord One Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventy Six, at Alnwick …. Thomas Brown of Alnwick Moor …. Shepherd is Convicted before the undersigned, Two of Her Majesty’s Justices of the Peace for the said County, for that he the said Thomas Brown on the ninth day of September 1876 at the Township of Alnwick in the parish of Alnmouth in the County aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully commit Trespass by being on the day time upon certain land then situate in the occupation by one ‘Potts’ of Cook Hill Morpeth in the said County in the search of Game to wit  Grouse contrary to the Form of the Statute in such case made and provided. And we adjudge the said Thomas Brown for his said offence to forfeit and pay the sum of nine shillings and six pence to be paid  and applied according to Law, and also to pay Henry Embleton Trotter of Alnwick in the said County, the Informer, the sum of ten shillings and six pence for his cost in this behalf; And if the said several sums be not paid forthwith, We adjudge the said Thomas Brown to be imprisoned in the House of Correction at Morpeth, in the said County and there to be kept to hard labour for the space of fourteen days. Unless the said several sums shall be paid sooner.

Alnwick, 4th November 1876

Thomas Brown (Appellant) and Henry Embleton Trotter (Respondent) faced each other at the Northumberland Epiphany Quarter Sessions, 1877 . Mr Brown was appealing against an accusation of trespass made by Mr Trotter. The alleged trespass took place on the heath of Alnwick Moor; an area which had been divided under enclosure Acts dated 2 March 1854. The Freemen of Alnwick possessed eatage (the right to use the grassland for pasturage) on Alnwick Moor. They had let this portion of the moor (where the trespass allegedly occurred) to Mr Trotter. Mr Trotter also leased game from his Grace the Duke of Northumberland, as evidenced by a stamped and sealed lease dated 13th July 1876. This game was to be managed by Mr Trotter and reserved for the Dukes’ private hunting. Alnwick Moor also adjoined the Dukes’ personal park, where another large group of game was also preserved. Consequently, game belonging to the Duke frequently came over the Duke’s Wall onto the heath moor (possessed and managed by the Freemen of Alnwick).

Mr Trotter had employed Mr Brown and his father to act as shepherds. They were instructed to care for the moor and given accommodation on the allotments. But Mr Trotter argued that their treatment of that portion of the moor was motivated by greed, and that they had abused their position by illegally hunting. In court Mr Trotter, a Gentleman of Alnwick , claimed Brown had illegally trespassed and hunted the Duke’s game. He was supported in his claims by a string of witness testimonies.

In the initial trial Henry Embleton Trotter attested to:

“[finding] the Defendant on Alnwick Moor between Reedside Road and Turnpike. I am leasee of Game. He had a dog and gun and ranging the ground. I cautioned him a fortnight before. He said he had a right to carry a gun. He fired a shot after I left him. I watched him for an hour and half with a glass – grouse on the place. I know he is the shepherd’s son. No sheep were where I found him and the dog ranging.”

Mr Trotter claimed he had seen Mr Brown stalking (passing between parcels of land with no obvious permission to do so.) Mr Brown claimed he was carrying out his duty as a shepherd; to carry a gun and protect the land. Mr Dix, who represented Mr Brown in the original trial, addressed the magistrates stating there was no actual case to answer, as Mr Trotter had not actually seen Mr Brown fire his gun and had actually only observed him passing between parcels of land. This, Mr Dix stated, was not a crime. He claimed his client carried a gun as two sheep had been lost to stray dogs during the previous month. He also emphasized how willing and compliant Mr Brown had been when searched for illegal game – a search which proved to be fruitless.

The bench of Justices consisted of the following individuals:

  • J Craster Esq
  • S F Widdrington Esq
  • T Clutherbuck Esq
  • J R Carr Ellison Esq

Despite Mr Dix’s strong case this gathering of men believed, for whatever reason, that the evidence against Mr Brown was quite sufficient to justify a conviction. However, the defendant had 3 days to serve a Notice of Appeal following the Justices Meeting. The case had been heard on a Saturday; thus meaning Sunday was the 1st day, Monday the 2nd & Tuesday the 3rd. But the Respondent did not get the Notice until the 4th day (Wednesday morning) when it was picked up in the Archway near the outer door of his house. If the Notice had been put under the door anytime before 10.30 pm o’clock on the Tuesday the respondent said he would have seen it; for he had “set a friend of his to the outer door at that time and no Notice was seen in the Archway at where it had been pushed under the gate next the street.”

The notice stated:

To Henry Emblazon Trotter of Alnwick in the County of Northumberland Gentleman.

Take notice that, I , the undersigned Thomas Brown of Alnwick Moor, in the County of Northumberland, Shepherd, do intend to enter and prosecute an appeal at the next General or Quarter Sessions of the Peace to be holden not less than 12 days after the 7th day of October instant at Newcastle upon Tyne, in and for the County of Northumberland against  a certain conviction or order bearing the date the said 7th day of October instant and made by John Craster and S F Widdrington Esquires Her Majestys Justices of the Peace for the said County of Northumberland.

Mr Brown chose to appeal these false accusations and, as it would appear from related documentation, he had a strong case to do so. We can only hope he was found innocent of false charges.

 

We would like to thank the volunteer who carefully transcribed these documents and allowed this blog to be produced.

 

 

The Reavelley and Forster Bond, 1740

by

Reavelley   Gent

   To

    Forster  Gent

            Bond dated 1 Sep 1740

KNOW ALL MEN by those present that J. James Reavelly of Alemouth in the County of Northumberland Gentleman  (am listed)  and family bound unto Joseph Fforster of Newton by the Sea in the said County Gentleman in the (  )  all  sum of Two hundred and forty pounds of good and Lawfull money of Great Britain to be paid to the said Joseph Fforster or to his Certain Attorney his Executors Administrators or Assigns to which payment well and truly made I bind myself my Heirs Executors and Administrators firmly by these here presents sealed with with my (seal) dated this first day of September in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and forty.

THE CONDITION of this obligation is such that if the above bounder James Reavelley his Heirs Executors or Administrators do and shall well and truly pay or cause to be paid unto this above named Joseph Fforster his Administrators or his Executors or Assigns this full sum one hundred and twenty pounds of Lawfull Money of great Britain with legal (  ) for the (  ) on or before this first day of March next ensuing the date hereof then their obligation to be paid or otherwise to be and remain in full force and (virtue)

Sealed and Delivered                                                                       James Reavelley      {  seal }

In the presence of us

Thomas Collingwood Esq.

Collingwood Forster

 

 

We would like to thank the volunteer who carefully transcribed and researched these documents. This particular item comes from a very rich sub-collection within the larger Dickson, Archer and Thorp collection, giving us a fascinating view of a bygone time.

 

+ More