Execution of a King

Carved head of Charles 1 is on the head of a wine cask that had contained burgundy and which was a present from Mary de Medici, Queen of Henry IV of France to her daughter Henrietta Maria Queen of Charles 1 of England.

On this day in 1649, Kind Charles 1 was executed on scaffolding beside the Banqueting House, Whitehall . It was just before two in the afternoon when the King was finally summoned to the scaffold. He was conveyed through a window onto the platform. The beheading block was a mere eight inches high, so that he would have to lie prostrate at the feet of the executioner, and staples had been hammered in nearby so that he might be tied if he refused to submit to his death.

His final remarks to Bishop Juxon were “I go from a corruptible to an incorruptible crown” and “Remember”, presumably so that his words could be accurately conveyed to the Prince of Wales and others. The King made a last silent prayer, removed his cloak and lay down prone on the block. After a few seconds, he made a sign and the executioner performed his duty with a single blow.

At the Restoration in 1660, Parliament passed an Act for the Attainder of people involved in the trail and execution of King Charles 1. Twenty four of them had already died, including Cromwell, John Bradshaw (the Judge who was President of the Court), and Henry Ireton (Cromwell’s son-in-law). These three were given a posthumous execution whereby their remains were exhumed, hanged and beheaded and their bodies cast into a pit below the gallows, their heads were placed on spikes at the end of Westminster Hall. Several others were hanged, drawn and quartered, while 19 were imprisoned for life. Property confiscated from many, and most were barred from holding public office or title again. Twenty-one of those under threat fled England, mostly settling in the Netherlands or Switzerland, although three settled in New England.

The headsman and his assistant were unnamed and identified as “those two persons, … who being disguised by frocks and vizors, did appear upon the scaffold erected before Whitehall”.  Sidney Lee states in the Dictionary of National Biography (1866) that the headsman may have been Richard Brandon. Richard Brandon was the Common Hangman of London in 1649 and he is frequently noted as the man who executed the death warrant of King Charles I; although the precise identity of the executioner is still unknown.  Brandon had been approached and declined to do the job, although he might later have accepted under threat.

A pamphlet purporting to be a confession by Brandon was published posthumously, in which it is stated that he received £30 for performing the execution, which was given to him ‘all in half crowns’. The register of St Mary Matfelon, the parish church of Whitechapel, records “1649. June 2. Richard Brandon, a man out of Rosemary Lane.” And to this is added the following memorandum: “This R. Brandon is supposed to have cut off the head of Charles I”.  This Brandon was the son of Gregory Brandon, and claimed the headman’s axe by inheritance – he was even known as “Young Gregory”.

Gregory Brandon was said to be the illegitimate grandson or great grandson of Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk. The notoriety of Gregory and “Young Gregory” led to “the Gregory Tree” becoming a euphemism for the gallows, and was one of the reasons for the decline in popularity of the name Gregory.  The name “Gregory” became a general nickname for executioners:

More details of the Richard Bardon’s confession can be seen at http://anglicanhistory.org/charles/brandon_confession1649.html

Parliamentary Act of 1660-61 ‘for the Attainder of several persons Guilty of the Horrid Murther of His late Sacred Majesty King Charles the First’

A Berwick Borough Surveyor (Twixt Thistle and Rose)

It’s a popular belief that the older the record the more interesting it is – but records from any era can contain unique information that conjures up the times in which they were written.


Last week, as I was looking through some of the Urban Sanitary Authority records, I came across a rather plain notebook [Reference LB 27/2]. This outwardly prosaic book begins with detailed, handwritten water usage charts and is described in the Archives handlist as “An analysis of water supplies 1899-1944 (also contains an Old Bridge road traffic census of 1922)”. This is an accurate description of a large part of the book but, on inspection, it contains much more. It is a fascinating Day Book – a bit like Project Managers diary – that draws you into the mind of the writer with every turn of the page.

Traffic Census on the old bridge, Berwick-upon-Tweed 1922

The Urban Sanitary Authority was the product of a series of Public Health Acts in the first half of the nineteenth century that were passed to control and combat deadly diseases such as Cholera. Many of the statutory duties of the Urban Sanitary Authority eventually passed to the Town Council as clean streets, good housing and plentiful, pure water became the standard measures of civilization.

The Council Buildings on Wallace Green that were originally converted for the Urban Sanitary Authority


The Tweed is tidal and its water saline so Berwick, throughout its history (and as the records testify), was reliant on wells for its water supply. Ensuring water was fit to drink was a common concern. On establishing the Urban Sanitary Authority responsibility fell upon the Borough Surveyor and the Inspector of Nuisances to identify or create healthy water sources and to ensure that they were kept free of contaminants.

Excavation tables, 1914

When I began to leaf through the pages of this volume I quickly noticed the writer was a skilled draughtsman who also liked to record informal notes about the works being undertaken. I had the sense that this was someone who took pride in and enjoyed his work. As a result, I wanted to know more about him. His technical drawings have an accomplished artistry that put me in mind of Leonardo da Vinci’s notebooks. It’s pure speculation, but the first comprehensive translation of those Notebooks was by Richter in 1888. I wondered if the Borough Surveyor might have seen them as a young man and felt he was part of a long line of inventors and engineers. Archives can be dangerously thought provoking!

Notes on the Spa Well, Spittal whose source had changed course in 1919

The notebook is almost entirely the work of Robert Dickinson, Borough Surveyor from 1890-1929. There is an oil painting of him (seated at a desk with a notebook) by the artist Frank Watson Wood in Berwick Town Hall .

Settling wells at Bondington, Castle Terrace

He was a local boy, a son of Robert Dickinson, a boot and shoemaker from Tweedmouth, and his Scottish wife Lillias. I found the family in the 1871 census living in Marygate. In 1881 the family had moved to 26 Castlegate. Robert was 19 and is described as a Town Surveyors Assistant – already pursuing his future career. He is Town Surveyor in 1891 and living with his wife, Margaret, at 46 Ravensdowne. Ten years later, a widower, he lives at 6 Wallace Green – opposite the Urban Sanitary Authority buildings. His colleague, the Inspector of Nuisances, also lived in the same street! Robert was there still in 1911, seems to have retired about 1930 and died, in Berwick in 1951 aged 89.

Drainage at 20 Hide Hill

The book is mainly concerned with the works he commissioned or managed (some examples are included above) but he peppers it with facts prompted by curiosity or conversations. This includes a note that the specification for works was altered to preserve a Hart’s Tongue Fern found growing on the ramparts. He takes care to write down the botanical name of the fern – Scotopendrium Vulgaro – as given to him by Captain Norman.

Harts Tongue Fern protected

Robert also copies extracts from academic journals on geology, colleagues findings from surveys and estimations and a list and planting plan of the roses outside the Urban Sanitary Authority buildings in Wallace Green. He makes a sketch of the timber structure underneath the plaster finish in his office and makes notes on an the removal of an old dolphin recovered from the river.

Rose planting scheme, 1921

He is also interested in people  – keeping lists of workmen employed and information about the introduction of the old age pension. He makes notes on those working in the Surveyors office – including some who joined up to fight in the Great War. The effects of war on prices, labour supply and so on are also recorded.

Thomas Evans – employment, wages and war record
Cover of a Wartime leaflet on the price of smithy work in the Berwick area
War Savings Shell erected near Scotsgate, 1920

This volume shows that a record has many layers – the information it contains, the person who created it, why they created it and why it was retained. A full description of content and context is essential when it is catalogued to make it available for the widest range of research.

Register of workmen

It would be fascinating to compare five centuries of civil engineering in Berwick and there is plenty in the collection to research this aspect of Berwick’s history. Robert Dickinson is just one in a long line of inspectors, surveyors and workmen striving to ensure Berwick functioned as a prosperous and healthy place. The Guild, through their Works Committee, carried out many improvements before the Urban Sanitary Authority existed. This last drawing refers to an old dolphin that was removed in the time of Robert Dickinson. Much earlier records also refer to the protection of the Quay and old Bridge by the placement and replacement of such defensive structures in the river.

Remnants of former Berwick Bridge, 1905

Robert’s work is also recorded in a series of records that were part of the Urban Sanitary Authority collection (summarized in the 1978 Handlist – E 1-30). Intriguingly, in volume E 7/1, there is a typescript report on road widening in 1912 at the junction of Chapel Street and Walkergate. It is signed by Robert Dickinson and it refers to the reconstruction of the Rose and Thistle Public House. If it is where we think it is (the present Cobbled Yard Hotel) – I am sitting opposite it as I write. More about that in a later post perhaps!

Shell Shock at St George’s Hospital

Survivors

No doubt they’ll soon get well; the shock and strain  
  Have caused their stammering, disconnected talk.  
Of course they’re ‘longing to go out again,’—  
  These boys with old, scared faces, learning to walk.  
They’ll soon forget their haunted nights; their cowed  
  Subjection to the ghosts of friends who died,—  
Their dreams that drip with murder; and they’ll be proud  
  Of glorious war that shatter’d all their pride…  
Men who went out to battle, grim and glad;  
Children, with eyes that hate you, broken and mad.

Craiglockart. October, 1917.

Siegfried Sassoon 

Shell shock in the First World War could obliterate the lives of survivors. It is estimated that by the end of the War over 80,000 cases of shell shock were treated by British Army medical facilities. The psychological damage inflicted on thousands of young men, described by Sassoon in his poem Survivors, can be seen in the recently opened records of St George’s Hospital, Morpeth. One such case was that of Walter Winn, who enlisted into Royal Marines on the 3rd August 1915 in Newcastle, aged 17. Walter was an Insurance Clerk, born in Morpeth 1898. His war record describes a young man of good character and satisfactory ability. According to his doctor, Walter was a well-developed youth with dark hair, blue eyes and a fresh complexion.

In the medical case notes from St George’s Hospital, it states that Walter’s ‘physiological attack’ has been caused by the shock of witnessing the sinking of the HMS Vanguard. On 9 July 1917, after a day on exercise at Scapa Flow, the Vanguard was sunk almost immediately by a series of internal explosions. Only three men on-board survived the initial blast. One of the injured men, Lieutenant Commander Duke, later died of his wounds. 843 men died in the explosion which remains the worst accident in the Royal Navy’s wartime history. One witness, Ernest ‘Mick’ Moroney, wrote in his notebook that a ‘trawler which was close by got smothered in blood and pieces of human flesh, and afterwards picked up half the body of a marine’.

The trauma of the experience had a profound effect on Walter and his case notes from St George’s Hospital paint a harrowing picture of his condition. His doctor wrote that Walter is deluded and ‘wildly excited’. He hears paranormal voices in the walls that give him electric shocks. He mutters to himself about ships and boats. The doctor notes that Mrs Winn, Walter’s mother, ‘says the lad has been sleeping badly, has threatened to commit suicide on several occasions, has tried to cut his throat with a table knife, which he had concealed up his sleeve, being prevented on one occasion by a sister.’

During the First World War many men, like Walter, found themselves reliving their war and combat experiences long after they had left the battlefield. The physical manifestation of shell shock could include a broad range of symptoms affecting each man differently: anxiety, paralysis, limping or jerking, blindness and deafness, nightmares, heart palpitations, depression and disorientation. Such symptoms of shock were clearly understood by the doctors at St George’s who noted that while Walter is ‘nervous’ and ‘abnormally quiet’ (except in his mutterings to imagined people), his knee jerks, gait and speech are normal. In his notes the doctor appears happy with the progress Walter is making, writing that he is ‘brightening up’  and that he is ‘mentally much improved’ in August 1917. By the end of September, however, he has relapsed, possibly caused by being attacked by a fellow patient. Despite this setback, in the October of 1917 Walter begins to make good progress again and by the 15th April 1918 is he well enough to leave the Hospital. The final entry in the case notes simply read ‘Discharged – Recovered’.  He had been at the Hospital for almost nine months. Walter’s war record states that he was discharged from the military on the 19th March 1918, the reasons given as ‘Invalided – Insanity’. There is no mention of the sinking of the Vanguard or Walter’s mental shock. It seems however, the Walter never fully recovered from his war time experiences. In the 1939 Register records Walter as a patient at Newcastle City Mental Hospital. Walter died, aged 76, in the care of Newcastle City Mental Hospital and was buried at All Saints, Gosforth 7 May 1975.

The records of St Georges Hospital give a fascinating and often tragic insight into the lives of the victims of shell shock in our region.